Connectivity Analysis during Rubber Hand Illusion—A Pilot TMS-EEG Study in a Patient with SCI. (8th February 2021)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Frey, Vanessa N.; Thomschewski, Aljoscha; Langthaler, Patrick B.; Kunz, Alexander B.; Höller, Yvonne; Trinka, Eugen; Nardone, Raffaele
• Other Names: Terao Yasuo Academic Editor.
• Is Part Of: Neural plasticity. Volume 2021(2021)
• Publication Date: 2021-02-08
• Subjects: Neuroplasticity -- Periodicals; 612.82
• DOI: 10.1155/2021/6695530
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 2090-5904

Abstract

Abstract : Background . Bodily self-perception is an important concept for several neurological disorders, including spinal cord injury (SCI). Changing one's bodily self-perception, e.g., via rubber hand illusion (RHI), induces alterations of bottom-up and top-down pathways and with this the connectivity between involved brain areas. We aim to examine whether (1) this process can be manipulated by changing cortical excitability, (2) connectivity between relevant brain areas differ when the RHI cannot be evoked, and (3) how this projection differs in a patient with SCI. Method . We applied RHI and facilitatory theta burst stimulation (TBS) on the right primary somatosensory cortex (S1) of 18 healthy participants and one patient with incomplete, cervical SCI. During RHI, we recorded high-density electroencephalography (HD-EEG) and extracted directed and nondirected connectivity measures. Results . There is no difference in connectivity between sham and real TBS or in the effectivity of RHI. We observed a higher laterality in the patient, i.e., higher connectivity of the right and lower of the left hemisphere. Besides this, connectivity patterns do not differ between healthy participants and the patient. Conclusion . This connectivity pattern might represent a neuroplastic response in the attempt to overcome the functional impairment of the patient resulting in a similar overall connectivity pattern to the healthy participants, yet with a higher sensitivity towards RHI and a higher laterality. The cortico-cortical communication was not altered depending on whether the illusion was provoked or not; hence, the perceptory illusion could not be observed in the EEG analysis.