Assessing the predictive ability of the Suicide Crisis Inventory for near‐term suicidal behavior using machine learning approaches. Issue 1 (9th November 2020)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Parghi, Neelang; Chennapragada, Lakshmi; Barzilay, Shira; Newkirk, Saskia; Ahmedani, Brian; Lok, Benjamin; Galynker, Igor
• Is Part Of: International journal of methods in psychiatric research. Volume 30:Issue 1(2021)
• Page Start: n/a
• Page End: n/a
• Publication Date: 2020-11-09
• Subjects: Imminent Risk -- machine learning -- risk assessment -- suicide -- suicide crisis syndrome; Psychiatry -- Research -- Methodology -- Periodicals; Psychiatry -- Periodicals; 616.890072
• DOI: 10.1002/mpr.1863
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 1049-8931

Abstract

Abstract: Objective: This study explores the prediction of near‐term suicidal behavior using machine learning (ML) analyses of the Suicide Crisis Inventory (SCI), which measures the Suicide Crisis Syndrome, a presuicidal mental state. Methods: SCI data were collected from high‐risk psychiatric inpatients ( N = 591) grouped based on their short‐term suicidal behavior, that is, those who attempted suicide between intake and 1‐month follow‐up dates ( N = 20) and those who did not ( N = 571). Data were analyzed using three predictive algorithms (logistic regression, random forest, and gradient boosting) and three sampling approaches (split sample, Synthetic minority oversampling technique, and enhanced bootstrap). Results: The enhanced bootstrap approach considerably outperformed the other sampling approaches, with random forest (98.0% precision; 33.9% recall; 71.0% Area under the precision‐recall curve [AUPRC]; and 87.8% Area under the receiver operating characteristic [AUROC]) and gradient boosting (94.0% precision; 48.9% recall; 70.5% AUPRC; and 89.4% AUROC) algorithms performing best in predicting positive cases of near‐term suicidal behavior using this dataset. Conclusions: ML can be useful in analyzing data from psychometric scales, such as the SCI, and for predicting near‐term suicidal behavior. However, in cases such as the current analysis where the data are highly imbalanced, the optimal method of measuring performance must be carefully considered and selected.