Comprehensive analysis of SARS‐CoV‐2 antibody dynamics in New Zealand. Issue 3 (14th March 2021)
- Record Type:
- Journal Article
- Title:
- Comprehensive analysis of SARS‐CoV‐2 antibody dynamics in New Zealand. Issue 3 (14th March 2021)
- Main Title:
- Comprehensive analysis of SARS‐CoV‐2 antibody dynamics in New Zealand
- Authors:
- Whitcombe, Alana L
McGregor, Reuben
Craigie, Alyson
James, Alex
Charlewood, Richard
Lorenz, Natalie
Dickson, James MJ
Sheen, Campbell R
Koch, Barbara
Fox‐Lewis, Shivani
McAuliffe, Gary
Roberts, Sally A
Morpeth, Susan C
Taylor, Susan
Webb, Rachel H
Jack, Susan
Upton, Arlo
Ussher, James E
Moreland, Nicole J - Abstract:
- Abstract: Objectives: Circulating antibodies are important markers of previous infection and immunity. Questions remain with respect to the durability and functionality of SARS‐CoV‐2 antibodies. This study explored antibody responses in recovered COVID‐19 patients in a setting where the probability of re‐exposure is effectively nil, owing to New Zealand's successful elimination strategy. Methods: A triplex bead‐based assay that detects antibody isotype (IgG, IgM and IgA) and subclass (IgG1, IgG2, IgG3 and IgG4) responses against Nucleocapsid (N) protein, the receptor binding domain (RBD) and Spike (S) protein of SARS‐CoV‐2 was developed. After establishing baseline levels with pre‐pandemic control sera ( n = 113), samples from PCR‐confirmed COVID‐19 patients with mild–moderate disease ( n = 189) collected up to 8 months post‐infection were examined. The relationship between antigen‐specific antibodies and neutralising antibodies (NAbs) was explored with a surrogate neutralisation assay that quantifies inhibition of the RBD/hACE‐2 interaction. Results: While most individuals had broad isotype and subclass responses to each antigen shortly after infection, only RBD and S protein IgG, as well as NAbs, were relatively stable over the study period, with 99%, 96% and 90% of samples, respectively, having responses over baseline 4–8 months post‐infection. Anti‐RBD antibodies were strongly correlated with NAbs at all time points (Pearson's r ≥ 0.87), and feasibility of usingAbstract: Objectives: Circulating antibodies are important markers of previous infection and immunity. Questions remain with respect to the durability and functionality of SARS‐CoV‐2 antibodies. This study explored antibody responses in recovered COVID‐19 patients in a setting where the probability of re‐exposure is effectively nil, owing to New Zealand's successful elimination strategy. Methods: A triplex bead‐based assay that detects antibody isotype (IgG, IgM and IgA) and subclass (IgG1, IgG2, IgG3 and IgG4) responses against Nucleocapsid (N) protein, the receptor binding domain (RBD) and Spike (S) protein of SARS‐CoV‐2 was developed. After establishing baseline levels with pre‐pandemic control sera ( n = 113), samples from PCR‐confirmed COVID‐19 patients with mild–moderate disease ( n = 189) collected up to 8 months post‐infection were examined. The relationship between antigen‐specific antibodies and neutralising antibodies (NAbs) was explored with a surrogate neutralisation assay that quantifies inhibition of the RBD/hACE‐2 interaction. Results: While most individuals had broad isotype and subclass responses to each antigen shortly after infection, only RBD and S protein IgG, as well as NAbs, were relatively stable over the study period, with 99%, 96% and 90% of samples, respectively, having responses over baseline 4–8 months post‐infection. Anti‐RBD antibodies were strongly correlated with NAbs at all time points (Pearson's r ≥ 0.87), and feasibility of using finger prick sampling to accurately measure anti‐RBD IgG was demonstrated. Conclusion: Antibodies to SARS‐CoV‐2 persist for up to 8 months following mild‐to‐moderate infection. This robust response can be attributed to the initial exposure without immune boosting given the lack of community transmission in our setting. Abstract : This study shows that antibodies to SARS‐CoV‐2 persist for up to 8 months following mild‐to‐moderate infection. This robust response can be attributed to the initial exposure without immune boosting given the lack of community transmission in New Zealand. The figure was created with BioRender.com . … (more)
- Is Part Of:
- Clinical & translational immunology. Volume 10:Issue 3(2021)
- Journal:
- Clinical & translational immunology
- Issue:
- Volume 10:Issue 3(2021)
- Issue Display:
- Volume 10, Issue 3 (2021)
- Year:
- 2021
- Volume:
- 10
- Issue:
- 3
- Issue Sort Value:
- 2021-0010-0003-0000
- Page Start:
- n/a
- Page End:
- n/a
- Publication Date:
- 2021-03-14
- Subjects:
- COVID‐19 -- immunokinetics -- neutralising antibodies -- SARS‐CoV‐2 -- Spike protein
Immunologic diseases -- Periodicals
Immunology -- Periodicals
Clinical medicine -- Periodicals
Immune System Diseases -- therapy
Immunotherapy
Immunologic Factors -- therapeutic use
Translational Medical Research
Molecular Targeted Therapy
Clinical medicine
Immunologic diseases
Immunology
Periodicals
Periodicals
Fulltext
Internet Resources
Periodicals
616.079 - Journal URLs:
- http://www.nature.com/cti/index.html ↗
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/journals/2610/ ↗
http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/journal/10.1002/(ISSN)2050-0068 ↗
http://www.nature.com/ ↗
http://www.nature.com/cti/index.html ↗ - DOI:
- 10.1002/cti2.1261 ↗
- Languages:
- English
- ISSNs:
- 2050-0068
- Deposit Type:
- Legaldeposit
- View Content:
- Available online (eLD content is only available in our Reading Rooms) ↗
- Physical Locations:
- British Library DSC - BLDSS-3PM
British Library HMNTS - ELD Digital store - Ingest File:
- 16098.xml