Optimal In Situ Fenestration Technique With Laser Perforation and Balloon Dilation for Aortic Stent-Grafts. (April 2021)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Lin, Jing; Rodriguez, Limael E.; Nutley, Mark; Jun, Lu; Mao, Ying; Parikh, Niraj; Alie-Cusson, Fanny; Zhang, Ze; Wang, Lu; Panneton, Jean M.; Guidoin, Robert
• Is Part Of: Journal of endovascular therapy. Volume 28:Number 2(2021)
• Page Start: 300
• Page End: 308
• Publication Date: 2021-04
• Subjects: balloon dilation -- ex vivo experiment -- fenestration -- laser fenestration -- noncompliant balloon -- polyester debris -- stent-graft -- tearing; Blood-vessels -- Endoscopic surgery -- Periodicals; Angioscopy -- Periodicals; Intravenous catheterization -- Periodicals; Peripheral vascular diseases -- Treatment -- Periodicals; Vascular Surgical Procedures -- Periodicals; Angioscopy -- Periodicals; Catheterization, Peripheral -- Periodicals; Peripheral Vascular Diseases -- therapy -- Periodicals; Angioscopie; Maladies vasculaires périphériques; 617.413
• DOI: 10.1177/1526602820981980
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 1526-6028

Abstract

Purpose: To evaluate the response of various stent-grafts after laser fenestration and dilation with noncompliant balloons to determine the optimal therapeutic combination for this treatment technique. Materials and Methods: Five aortic stent-grafts were evaluated ex vivo: the Bolton RelayPlus, Jotec E-vita Thoracic 3G, Medtronic Valiant, Cook Zenith Alpha, and Vascutek Anaconda. Small holes were created using an excimer laser with the grafts submerged in saline. Five rows of 5 fenestrations were created, 4 holes in each row were dilated once with a 6-, 8-, 10-, or 12-mm-diameter noncompliant balloon to the specified nominal pressure (one hole served as the control). The saline solution from each stent-graft was collected and qualitatively analyzed for debris. The fenestrations were evaluated under light and scanning electron microscopes. The maximum diameter and area for each fenestration were measured. The direction and length of tears were assessed. Results: The fenestration was feasible and reproducible in all the stent-grafts. The mean area of fenestration ranged from 7.63±1.63 to 14.75±0.73 mm 2 when using balloons of 6- and 8-mm diameter, respectively. The 10- and 12-mm-diameter balloons caused a significant increase in area, variability, and tearing. The Anaconda graft tended to tear in the weft direction, while the other devices tore in the warp direction when using the 10- and 12-mm-diameter balloons. Dilation of the RelayPlus and Anaconda grafts with 6- and 8-mm-diameter balloons provided minimal tearing and precise fenestrations. Melted fiber remnants were observed after filtration of the saline solution for all devices. Conclusion: Laser fenestration and dilation with noncompliant balloons is a relatively simple and reproducible option for revascularization in urgent, complex aortic endovascular repairs. In our model, large balloons (ie, >10 mm) increased the destruction and tearing of the fabric. The maximum dilation recommended is 6 to 8 mm to avoid significant tears. Development of stent-grafts or novel fabrics designed explicitly for fenestration is needed to reduce potential complications.