Phase II randomized study on tissue distribution and pharmacokinetics of cisplatin according to different levels of intra-abdominal pressure (IAP) during HIPEC (NCT02949791). Issue 1 (January 2021)
- Record Type:
- Journal Article
- Title:
- Phase II randomized study on tissue distribution and pharmacokinetics of cisplatin according to different levels of intra-abdominal pressure (IAP) during HIPEC (NCT02949791). Issue 1 (January 2021)
- Main Title:
- Phase II randomized study on tissue distribution and pharmacokinetics of cisplatin according to different levels of intra-abdominal pressure (IAP) during HIPEC (NCT02949791)
- Authors:
- Kusamura, Shigeki
Azmi, Norfarizan
Fumagalli, Luca
Baratti, Dario
Guaglio, Marcello
Cavalleri, Adalberto
Garrone, Giulia
Battaglia, Luigi
Barretta, Francesco
Deraco, Marcello - Abstract:
- Abstract: Aims: To evaluate the effects of high intra-abdominal pressure (IAP) during hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC) on cisplatin uptake by residual tumor and normal tissues, pharmacokinetics, and short-term surgical outcomes. Patients & methods: Patients with peritoneal metastasis from colorectal cancer or pseudomyxoma peritonei were randomized to closed-abdomen HIPEC with low-IAP or high-IAP, after complete cytoreduction. High-IAP was obtained increasing the volume of perfusate maintaining constant the cisplatin concentration (42 mg/L). We determined the Platinum concentration using an Inductive Coupled Plasma Mass Spectrometry System. Randomization was stratified according to tumor type. To consider the multiple sampling in the three tissues types of interest, we performed linear mixed models to assess the differences of cisplatin concentration between study arms. We also compared AUC perfusate/plasma ratios (Wilcoxon-Mann-Whitney) and perioperative severe complication rates (chi-square) between study arms. Results: 38 cases were randomly assigned to IAP arms (n = 19 each). Median IAPs were 19 mmHg and 11 mmHg in the high and low arms, respectively. Cisplatin concentrations did not differ in the tumor residual tissues and in the muscular fascia [22.8 ng/mg (SD: 25.5) vs. 15.9 ng/mg (SD: 13.3), p = 0.181] and [50.3 ng/mg (SD: 40.1) vs. 42.0 ng/mg (SD: 38.3), p = 0.426, respectively], whereas in the mesenteric peritoneum it did [5.4 ng/mg (SD: 7.82) vs.Abstract: Aims: To evaluate the effects of high intra-abdominal pressure (IAP) during hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC) on cisplatin uptake by residual tumor and normal tissues, pharmacokinetics, and short-term surgical outcomes. Patients & methods: Patients with peritoneal metastasis from colorectal cancer or pseudomyxoma peritonei were randomized to closed-abdomen HIPEC with low-IAP or high-IAP, after complete cytoreduction. High-IAP was obtained increasing the volume of perfusate maintaining constant the cisplatin concentration (42 mg/L). We determined the Platinum concentration using an Inductive Coupled Plasma Mass Spectrometry System. Randomization was stratified according to tumor type. To consider the multiple sampling in the three tissues types of interest, we performed linear mixed models to assess the differences of cisplatin concentration between study arms. We also compared AUC perfusate/plasma ratios (Wilcoxon-Mann-Whitney) and perioperative severe complication rates (chi-square) between study arms. Results: 38 cases were randomly assigned to IAP arms (n = 19 each). Median IAPs were 19 mmHg and 11 mmHg in the high and low arms, respectively. Cisplatin concentrations did not differ in the tumor residual tissues and in the muscular fascia [22.8 ng/mg (SD: 25.5) vs. 15.9 ng/mg (SD: 13.3), p = 0.181] and [50.3 ng/mg (SD: 40.1) vs. 42.0 ng/mg (SD: 38.3), p = 0.426, respectively], whereas in the mesenteric peritoneum it did [5.4 ng/mg (SD: 7.82) vs. 2.7 ng/mg (SD: 2.9), p = 0.048]. Pharmacokinetic advantage did not differ between the two arms. High-IAP did not increase perioperative severe complications rate (NCI-CTCAE.v3). Conclusions: high-IAP HIPEC increases cisplatin distribution in the mesenteric peritoneum, is safe, and could be considered to obtain microscopic cytoreduction. … (more)
- Is Part Of:
- European journal of surgical oncology. Volume 47:Issue 1(2021)
- Journal:
- European journal of surgical oncology
- Issue:
- Volume 47:Issue 1(2021)
- Issue Display:
- Volume 47, Issue 1 (2021)
- Year:
- 2021
- Volume:
- 47
- Issue:
- 1
- Issue Sort Value:
- 2021-0047-0001-0000
- Page Start:
- 82
- Page End:
- 88
- Publication Date:
- 2021-01
- Subjects:
- Peritoneal surface malignancy (PSM) -- Hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC) -- Cytoreductive surgery (CRS) -- Intra-abdominal pressure -- Hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (IAP-HIPEC) -- Pseudomyxoma peritonei -- Colorectal cancer
Oncology -- Periodicals
Cancer -- Surgery -- Periodicals
Medical Oncology -- Periodicals
Neoplasms -- surgery -- Periodicals
Cancer -- Chirurgie -- Périodiques
Cancérologie -- Périodiques
Oncologie
Chirurgie (geneeskunde)
Electronic journals
Electronic journals -- Sciences
Electronic journals -- Medicine
Electronic journals
616.994059005 - Journal URLs:
- http://www.ejso.com/ ↗
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/journal/07487983 ↗
http://www.clinicalkey.com/dura/browse/journalIssue/07487983 ↗
http://www.clinicalkey.com.au/dura/browse/journalIssue/0720048X ↗
http://firstsearch.oclc.org ↗
http://firstsearch.oclc.org/journal=0748-7983;screen=info;ECOIP ↗
http://www.elsevier.com/journals ↗
http://www.harcourt-international.com/journals ↗
http://www.idealibrary.com/cgi-bin/links/toc/ejso ↗ - DOI:
- 10.1016/j.ejso.2019.06.022 ↗
- Languages:
- English
- ISSNs:
- 0748-7983
- Deposit Type:
- Legaldeposit
- View Content:
- Available online (eLD content is only available in our Reading Rooms) ↗
- Physical Locations:
- British Library DSC - 3829.745500
British Library DSC - BLDSS-3PM
British Library STI - ELD Digital store - Ingest File:
- 16052.xml