Reporting on quality of reduction and fixation of intertrochanteric fractures–A systematic review. Issue 3 (March 2021)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Marmor, Meir; Guenthner, Guy; Rezaei, Arash; Saam, Morshed; Matityahu, Amir
• Is Part Of: Injury. Volume 52:Issue 3(2021)
• Page Start: 324
• Page End: 329
• Publication Date: 2021-03
• Subjects: Hip fracture -- Reduction -- Fixation -- Neck-shaft angle -- Tip-Apex distance -- Varus -- Leg-length discrepancy -- Rotation -- Lateral wall -- Calcar; Wounds and injuries -- Surgery -- Periodicals; Accidents -- Periodicals; Wounds and Injuries -- surgery -- Periodicals; Lésions et blessures -- Chirurgie -- Périodiques; Electronic journals; Electronic journals; 617.1
• DOI: 10.1016/j.injury.2021.02.014
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 0020-1383

Abstract

Highlights: Leading journals do not have consistent reporting practices for the assessment of the quality of reduction and fixation of intertrochanteric fractures. Reporting on quality of reduction and fixation of intertrochanteric fractures has increased in volume over the past five years. Standardized quantitative metrics of quality of reduction of intertrochanteric fractures are needed in order to assess clinical outcomes. Abstract: Background: Patient outcomes after intertrochanteric fracture fixation is the subject of a large body of published and ongoing clinical research. Fracture reduction and stable fixation are a pre-requisite for achieving optimal results. However, reporting on the quality of postoperative reduction and fixation, has been inconsistent in the literature on intertrochanteric fractures. The purpose of this study was to examine the quality and consistency of reporting of immediate postoperative reduction and fixation in clinical outcome studies of intertrochanteric fracture fixation. Methods: Outcome studies of intertrochanteric fractures, published between 2001 and 2019, were identified using a PubMed. Six journals were identified as having a high impact on intertrochanteric fracture research by either having an impact factor greater than 3.0 or more than 30 published studies fulfilling inclusion criteria. Two independent reviewers reviewed each article for its reporting on immediate post-operative radiographic findings and whether an attempt was made to correlate these findings to outcomes. Quality and consistency of reduction reporting were assessed by recording the type and number of uniquely reported reduction metrics in all of the included studies. Results: The reviewers identified 134 papers for the study, of which 110 (82%) reported on immediate postoperative radiographic findings. Of the papers reporting these findings, 84 (76%) reported quantitative measurements. Quantitative reporting changed from 79% in papers published between 2001-2014 to 86% in papers published between 2015-2019. Sixty-one (46%) papers reported Tip-Apex Distance, 56 (42%) reported degree of varus (compared to non-injured side), 42 (31%) reported Neck-Shaft Angle restoration, 31(23%) reported leg-length discrepancy, 18 (13%) reported rotation, 15(11%) reported on the status of the lateral wall, and 6 (4%) reported on calcar (medial buttress) reduction. Sixty-eight (51%) papers that measured reduction found an association between better immediate post-operative reduction and improved outcomes. Conclusions: Despite its recognized influence on outcomes of intertrochanteric fractures, leading peer-reviewed journals do not uniformly report on the immediate postoperative assessment of the quality of reduction and fixation. However, reporting has improved over the past five years. Standardized quantitative metrics will need to be reported in the future to allow meaningful comparisons between studies and accurate assessment of intertrochanteric fracture outcome.