Cut-off and forgotten?: Livelihood disruption, social impacts and food insecurity arising from the East African Crude Oil Pipeline. (April 2021)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Ogwang, Tom; Vanclay, Frank
• Is Part Of: Energy research & social science. Volume 74(2021)
• Publication Date: 2021-04
• Subjects: Project-induced displacement and resettlement -- Social impact assessment -- Business and human rights -- Transboundary projects -- Megaprojects -- East Africa Crude Oil Pipeline; Power resources -- Social aspects -- Periodicals; Energy consumption -- Social aspects -- Periodicals; 333.7905
• DOI: 10.1016/j.erss.2021.101970
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 2214-6296

Abstract

Highlights: Oil & gas pipelines potentially contribute to economic growth and development. Pipelines can cause serious social, environmental and livelihood impacts. Pipelines can create physical and economic displacement and impoverishment. There are human rights issues associated with how the cut-off date is implemented. Delays in construction exacerbate the social impacts from projects. Abstract: We examined the Uganda section of the East African Crude Oil Pipeline (EACOP), especially the social and livelihood impacts from land acquisition. EACOP, which will cost over USD $3.5 billion in total, is intended to transport crude oil from Hoima in the Albertine Graben region of Uganda to Tanga in Tanzania, a distance of 1443 kms. A multi-methods approach was used, including 86 in-depth interviews, focus group discussions, participant observation, and document analysis. Although by late 2020 pipeline construction had not commenced, route planning and land acquisition for the pipeline had already created many environmental and social impacts, including: physical displacement; resettlement; economic displacement; disputed valuations; delayed compensation; livelihood disruption; food insecurity; and uncertainty, fear and anxiety. The likely benefits of the project include: employment opportunities (although these will mostly be short term); improved infrastructure and accessibility; and oil revenue to the nation. A major issue has been delays to the project, which have exacerbated anxiety and livelihood impacts. Confusion has occurred around the meaning and implementation of the 'cut-off date'. To gain a social licence to operate, we recommend that all stakeholders give greater consideration to addressing the negative environmental and social impacts, and to augmenting project benefits. We also recommend that the international standards and procedures used in project land acquisition pay more attention to how the cut-off date is explained to and understood by local communities, and how it is operationalised, especially in relation to subsistence farming activities.