Factors that influence specialist physician preferences for fee-for-service and salary-based payment models: A qualitative study. Issue 4 (April 2021)
- Record Type:
- Journal Article
- Title:
- Factors that influence specialist physician preferences for fee-for-service and salary-based payment models: A qualitative study. Issue 4 (April 2021)
- Main Title:
- Factors that influence specialist physician preferences for fee-for-service and salary-based payment models: A qualitative study
- Authors:
- Ogundeji, Yewande Kofoworola
Quinn, Amity
Lunney, Meaghan
Chong, Christy
Chew, Derek
Danso, George
Duggan, Shelly
Edwards, Alun
Hopkin, Gareth
Senior, Peter
Sumner, Glen
Williams, Jennifer
Manns, Braden - Abstract:
- Highlights: Physicians' desire for flexibility or autonomy and their professional interests influence payment model preferences. Many early- to mid-career female physicians prefer payment models that offer flexibility and work-life balance. Attributes of alternative payment models might be more appealing to early-career physicians. Optimizing non-monetary attributes of alternative payment models may increase their voluntary selection by physicians. Abstract: Most physicians across the world are paid through fee-for-service. However, there is increased interest in alternative payment models such as salary, capitation, episode-based payment, pay-for-performance, and strategic blends of these models. Such models may be more aligned with broad health policy goals such as fiscal sustainability, delivery of high-quality care, and physician and patient well-being. Despite this, there is limited research on physicians' preferences for different models and a disproportionate focus on differences in income over other issues such as physician autonomy and purpose. Using qualitative interviews with 32 specialist physicians in Alberta, Canada, we examined factors that influence preferences for fee-for-service (FFS) and salary-based payment models. Our findings suggest that a series of factors relating to (1) physician characteristics, (2) payment model characteristics, and (3) professional interests influence preferences. Within these themes, flexibility, autonomy, and compatibility withHighlights: Physicians' desire for flexibility or autonomy and their professional interests influence payment model preferences. Many early- to mid-career female physicians prefer payment models that offer flexibility and work-life balance. Attributes of alternative payment models might be more appealing to early-career physicians. Optimizing non-monetary attributes of alternative payment models may increase their voluntary selection by physicians. Abstract: Most physicians across the world are paid through fee-for-service. However, there is increased interest in alternative payment models such as salary, capitation, episode-based payment, pay-for-performance, and strategic blends of these models. Such models may be more aligned with broad health policy goals such as fiscal sustainability, delivery of high-quality care, and physician and patient well-being. Despite this, there is limited research on physicians' preferences for different models and a disproportionate focus on differences in income over other issues such as physician autonomy and purpose. Using qualitative interviews with 32 specialist physicians in Alberta, Canada, we examined factors that influence preferences for fee-for-service (FFS) and salary-based payment models. Our findings suggest that a series of factors relating to (1) physician characteristics, (2) payment model characteristics, and (3) professional interests influence preferences. Within these themes, flexibility, autonomy, and compatibility with academic roles were highlighted. To encourage physicians to select a specific payment model, the model must appeal to them in terms of income potential as well as non-monetary values. These findings can support constructive discussions about the merits of different payment models and can assist policy makers in considering the impact of payment reform. … (more)
- Is Part Of:
- Health policy. Volume 125:Issue 4(2021)
- Journal:
- Health policy
- Issue:
- Volume 125:Issue 4(2021)
- Issue Display:
- Volume 125, Issue 4 (2021)
- Year:
- 2021
- Volume:
- 125
- Issue:
- 4
- Issue Sort Value:
- 2021-0125-0004-0000
- Page Start:
- 442
- Page End:
- 449
- Publication Date:
- 2021-04
- Subjects:
- Health system financing -- Physician payment models -- Preference -- Salary -- FFS -- Specialist physicians
Medical education -- Periodicals
Medical policy -- Periodicals
Delivery of Health Care -- Periodicals
Education, Medical -- Periodicals
Health Education -- Periodicals
Health Planning -- Periodicals
Public Policy -- Periodicals
Enseignement médical -- Périodiques
Politique sanitaire -- Périodiques
Medical education
Medical policy
Periodicals
Electronic journals
Electronic journals
362.1 - Journal URLs:
- http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/journal/01688510 ↗
http://www.healthpolicyjrnl.com/ ↗
http://www.clinicalkey.com/dura/browse/journalIssue/01688510 ↗
http://www.clinicalkey.com.au/dura/browse/journalIssue/01688510 ↗
http://www.elsevier.com/journals ↗ - DOI:
- 10.1016/j.healthpol.2020.12.014 ↗
- Languages:
- English
- ISSNs:
- 0168-8510
- Deposit Type:
- Legaldeposit
- View Content:
- Available online (eLD content is only available in our Reading Rooms) ↗
- Physical Locations:
- British Library DSC - 4275.102700
British Library DSC - BLDSS-3PM
British Library HMNTS - ELD Digital store - Ingest File:
- 16036.xml