Viability of SARS-CoV-2 in river water and wastewater at different temperatures and solids content. (1st May 2021)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: de Oliveira, Leonardo Camilo; Torres-Franco, Andrés Felipe; Lopes, Bruna Coelho; Santos, Beatriz Senra Álvares da Silva; Costa, Erica Azevedo; Costa, Michelle S.; Reis, Marcus Tulius P.; Melo, Marília C.; Polizzi, Rodrigo Bicalho; Teixeira, Mauro Martins; Mota, César Rossas
• Is Part Of: Water research. Volume 195(2021)
• Publication Date: 2021-05-01
• Subjects: SARS-CoV-2 -- viability -- persistence -- water -- wastewater -- temperature; Water -- Pollution -- Research -- Periodicals; 363.7394
• DOI: 10.1016/j.watres.2021.117002
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 0043-1354

Abstract

Highlights: Infectious SARS-CoV-2 was spiked in river water and wastewater to assess its viability Viability assessed in filtered and unfiltered samples, at 4°C and 24°C SARS-CoV-2 remained viable longer in filtered compared with unfiltered samples SARS-CoV-2 persistence at 4°C was 4 to 4.5 times longer than at 24°C Results relevant to assess risks to public health related to contaminated water Abstract: COVID-19 patients can excrete viable SARS-CoV-2 virus via urine and faeces, which has raised concerns over the possibility of COVID-19 transmission via aerosolized contaminated water or via the faecal-oral route. These concerns are especially exacerbated in many low- and middle-income countries, where untreated sewage is frequently discharged to surface waters. SARS-CoV-2 RNA has been detected in river water (RW) and raw wastewater (WW) samples. However, little is known about SARS-CoV-2 viability in these environmental matrices. Determining the persistence of SARS-CoV-2 in water under different environmental conditions is of great importance for basic assumptions in quantitative microbial risk assessment (QMRA). In this study, the persistence of SARS-CoV-2 was assessed using plaque assays following spiking of RW and WW samples with infectious SARS-CoV-2 that was previously isolated from a COVID-19 patient. These assays were carried out on autoclaved RW and WW samples, filtered (0.22 µm) and unfiltered, at 4 °C and 24 °C. Linear and nonlinear regression models were adjusted to the data. The Weibull regression model achieved the lowest root mean square error (RMSE) and was hence chosen to estimate T90 and T99 (time required for 1 log and 2 log reductions, respectively). SARS-CoV-2 remained viable longer in filtered compared with unfiltered samples. RW and WW showed T90 values of 1.9 and 1.2 day and T99 values of 6.4 and 4.0 days, respectively. When samples were filtered through 0.22 µm pore size membranes, T90 values increased to 3.3 and 1.5 days, and T99 increased to 8.5 and 4.5 days, for RW and WW samples, respectively. Remarkable increases in SARS-CoV-2 persistence were observed in assays at 4 °C, which showed T90 values of 7.7 and 5.5 days, and T99 values of 18.7 and 17.5 days for RW and WW, respectively. These results highlight the variability of SARS-CoV-2 persistence in water and wastewater matrices and can be highly relevant to efforts aimed at quantifying water-related risks, which could be valuable for understanding and controlling the pandemic. Graphical Abstract: Image, graphical abstract