Exploring women's attitudes, knowledge, and intentions to use oocyte freezing for non‐medical reasons: A systematic review. (5th November 2020)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Platts, Sophie; Trigg, Bethan; Bracewell‐Milnes, Timothy; Jones, Benjamin P.; Saso, Srdjan; Parikh, Jaya; Nicopoullos, James; Almeida, Paula; Norman‐Taylor, Julian; Nikolaou, Dimitrios; Johnson, Mark; Thum, Meen‐Yau
• Is Part Of: Acta obstetricia et gynecologica Scandinavica. Volume 100:Number 3(2021)
• Page Start: 383
• Page End: 393
• Publication Date: 2020-11-05
• Subjects: attitudes -- fertility -- infertility -- knowledge -- motivations -- non‐medical oocyte freezing -- oocyte freezing for non‐medical reasons; Gynecology -- Periodicals; Pregnancy -- Periodicals; Obstetrics -- Periodicals; 618.05
• DOI: 10.1111/aogs.14030
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 0001-6349

Abstract

Abstract: Introduction: Women are postponing childbearing and preventing age‐related fertility decline with oocyte freezing for non‐medical reasons (OFNMR). The objective of this systematic evaluation was to gain an understanding of women's attitudes and knowledge of, and intentions to use OFNMR among users of OFNMR and the general public. Material and methods: A systematic search of MEDLINE, EMBASE, and PyschINFO databases was undertaken, for studies that examined the psychosocial attitudes among women toward OFNMR. The search was limited to English language and no time restriction was set for publications. Extracted data were analyzed using thematic analysis and the study was performed according to PRISMA guidelines with prospective PROSPERO registration (CRD4201912578). Results: Overall, 35 studies met the inclusion criteria. Studies were broadly categorized into studies investigating users or potential users of OFNMR, and studies examining the views of members of the general public. Users of OFNMR have good knowledge of age‐related fertility decline and awareness of the OFNMR procedure. Lack of partner was identified as the most common motivating factor to undertake OFNMR, with cost as a predominant concern. Knowledge among the general public of OFNMR is highly variable. Underestimation of age‐related fertility decline is common among the general public. Intentions of women to use OFNMR also varied drastically between studies. Conclusions: Women are predominantly motivated to freeze eggs by the lack of a suitable partner, but cost is a significant barrier. Increasing the number of women pursuing OFNMR at an earlier stage may positively impact upon the risk of future involuntary childlessness. Better information should be made available to both women and men about their fertility and options to inform their reproductive decision‐making.