An improved decomposition method to differentiate meteorological and anthropogenic effects on air pollution: A national study in China during the COVID-19 lockdown period. (1st April 2021)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Song, Yushan; Lin, Changqing; Li, Ying; Lau, Alexis K.H.; Fung, Jimmy C.H.; Lu, Xingcheng; Guo, Cui; Ma, Jun; Lao, Xiang Qian
• Is Part Of: Atmospheric environment. Volume 250(2021)
• Publication Date: 2021-04-01
• Subjects: Air pollution -- Meteorology -- Pollutant emission -- Humidity -- COVID-19; Air -- Pollution -- Periodicals; Air -- Pollution -- Meteorological aspects -- Periodicals; 551.51
• DOI: 10.1016/j.atmosenv.2021.118270
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 1352-2310

Abstract

Abstract: Although the effects of meteorological factors on severe air pollution have been extensively investigated, quantitative decomposition of the contributions of meteorology and anthropogenic factors remains a big challenge. The novel coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic affords a unique opportunity to test decomposition method. Based on a wind decomposition method, this study outlined an improved method to differentiate complex meteorological and anthropogenic effects. The improved method was then applied to investigate the cause of unanticipated haze pollution in China during the COVID-19 lockdown period. Results from the wind decomposition method show that weakened winds increased PM2.5 concentrations in the Beijing–Tianjin area and northeastern China (e.g., by 3.19 μg/m 3 in Beijing). Using the improved decomposition method, we found that the combined meteorological effect (e.g., drastically elevated humidity levels and weakened airflow) substantially increased PM2.5 concentrations in northern China: the most substantial increases were in the Beijing–Tianjin–Hebei region (e.g., by 26.79 μg/m 3 in Beijing). On excluding the meteorological effects, PM2.5 concentrations substantially decreased across China (e.g., by 21.84 μg/m 3 in Beijing), evidencing that the strict restrictions on human activities indeed decreased PM2.5 concentrations. The unfavorable meteorological conditions, however, overwhelmed the beneficial effects of emission reduction, causing the severe haze pollution. These results indicate that the integrated meteorological effects should be considered to differentiate the meteorological and anthropogenic effects on severe air pollution. Highlights: An improved method was outlined to assess meteorological effect on air pollution. The cause of haze pollution during the COVID-19 lockdown period was investigated. Elevated humidity and weakened airflow greatly increased PM2.5 in northern China. On excluding the meteorological effects, PM2.5 substantially decreased across China.