109 Improving Escalation and Treatment Plans in the Borders General Hospital (BGH) During COVID-19. (16th March 2021)
- Record Type:
- Journal Article
- Title:
- 109 Improving Escalation and Treatment Plans in the Borders General Hospital (BGH) During COVID-19. (16th March 2021)
- Main Title:
- 109 Improving Escalation and Treatment Plans in the Borders General Hospital (BGH) During COVID-19
- Authors:
- Ralston, K
Campbell, A
Alcorn, G - Abstract:
- Abstract: Topic: Clear escalation and treatment plans created in discussion with patients are crucial to managing patients safely and appropriately. Our goal was to introduce a standardised, easily identifiable document for this purpose, with an aim of 90% of medical inpatients having a clear escalation plan discussed and documented. Intervention: We developed a Treatment Escalation Plan (TEP), raised awareness via different platforms and delivered teaching for staff. For baseline and subsequent data collections following interventions, we reviewed the notes of twenty random medical inpatients for decisions regarding escalation, patient involvement in decision making including capacity and specific interventions considered. We also included time taken to find information; documented patient/family discussions and whether a TEP was present. We collected qualitative feedback from staff. Improvement: After introduction, TEP was present in 35/60 patients (58%). Improvement was demonstrated across all measured domains when a TEP form was present: escalation decision (no TEP 80%, TEP 100%), discussion with patient/relative (no TEP 4%, TEP 85%), capacity decision regarding escalation (no TEP 52%, TEP 91%), decision on specific interventions (no TEP 12%, TEP 94%), mean time taken to find information (no TEP 84 seconds, TEP 34 seconds). Qualitative feedback from staff was positive, particularly the inclusion of specific care decisions beyond "DNACPR". Discussion: We felt it wasAbstract: Topic: Clear escalation and treatment plans created in discussion with patients are crucial to managing patients safely and appropriately. Our goal was to introduce a standardised, easily identifiable document for this purpose, with an aim of 90% of medical inpatients having a clear escalation plan discussed and documented. Intervention: We developed a Treatment Escalation Plan (TEP), raised awareness via different platforms and delivered teaching for staff. For baseline and subsequent data collections following interventions, we reviewed the notes of twenty random medical inpatients for decisions regarding escalation, patient involvement in decision making including capacity and specific interventions considered. We also included time taken to find information; documented patient/family discussions and whether a TEP was present. We collected qualitative feedback from staff. Improvement: After introduction, TEP was present in 35/60 patients (58%). Improvement was demonstrated across all measured domains when a TEP form was present: escalation decision (no TEP 80%, TEP 100%), discussion with patient/relative (no TEP 4%, TEP 85%), capacity decision regarding escalation (no TEP 52%, TEP 91%), decision on specific interventions (no TEP 12%, TEP 94%), mean time taken to find information (no TEP 84 seconds, TEP 34 seconds). Qualitative feedback from staff was positive, particularly the inclusion of specific care decisions beyond "DNACPR". Discussion: We felt it was critical to develop a TEP to ensure appropriate decisions are made and clearly documented for medical inpatients, especially in light of COVID-19. In patients with a TEP completed, we observed improvements in all domains, particularly in the involvement of patients/relatives in escalation decisions, which is key to delivering patient-centered care. Implementing a new system in a pandemic had challenges, such as continuity of staffing, however feedback was uniformly positive. This is an ongoing project that will continue to promote TEPs to improve patient care. … (more)
- Is Part Of:
- Age and ageing. Volume 50(2021)Supplement 1
- Journal:
- Age and ageing
- Issue:
- Volume 50(2021)Supplement 1
- Issue Display:
- Volume 50, Issue 1 (2021)
- Year:
- 2021
- Volume:
- 50
- Issue:
- 1
- Issue Sort Value:
- 2021-0050-0001-0000
- Page Start:
- i12
- Page End:
- i42
- Publication Date:
- 2021-03-16
- Subjects:
- Aging -- Periodicals
Geriatrics -- Periodicals
618.97 - Journal URLs:
- http://ageing.oxfordjournals.org ↗
http://ukcatalogue.oup.com/ ↗ - DOI:
- 10.1093/ageing/afab030.70 ↗
- Languages:
- English
- ISSNs:
- 0002-0729
- Deposit Type:
- Legaldeposit
- View Content:
- Available online (eLD content is only available in our Reading Rooms) ↗
- Physical Locations:
- British Library DSC - 0736.080000
British Library DSC - BLDSS-3PM
British Library HMNTS - ELD Digital store - Ingest File:
- 15988.xml