The firebreak problem. Issue 3 (21st August 2020)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Barnetson, Kathleen D.; Burgess, Andrea C.; Enright, Jessica; Howell, Jared; Pike, David A.; Ryan, Brady
• Is Part Of: Networks. Volume 77:Issue 3(2021)
• Page Start: 372
• Page End: 382
• Publication Date: 2020-08-21
• Subjects: computational complexity -- connectivity -- intersection graphs -- key players -- separation -- treewidth; Network analysis (Planning) -- Periodicals; 658.4032
• DOI: 10.1002/net.21975
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 0028-3045

Abstract

Abstract: Suppose we have a network that is represented by a graph G . Potentially a fire (or other type of contagion) might erupt at some vertex of G . We are able to respond to this outbreak by establishing a firebreak at k other vertices of G, so that the fire cannot pass through these fortified vertices. The question that now arises is which k vertices will result in the greatest number of vertices being saved from the fire, assuming that the fire will spread to every vertex that is not fully behind the k vertices of the firebreak. This is the essence of the Firebreak decision problem, which is the focus of this paper. We establish that the problem is intractable on the class of split graphs as well as on the class of bipartite graphs, but can be solved in linear time when restricted to graphs having constant‐bounded treewidth, or in polynomial time when restricted to intersection graphs. We also consider some closely related problems.