Novel C‐arm based planning spine surgery robot proved in a porcine model and quantitative accuracy assessment methodology. Issue 2 (26th October 2020)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Kim, Hyung Cheol; Jeon, Hyeongseok; An, Seong Bae; Kim, Hongho; Hwang, Sungteac; Cha, Yongyeob; Moon, Seohyun; Shin, Dong Ah; Ha, Yoon; Kim, Keung Nyun; Yoon, Do Heum; Yi, Seong
• Is Part Of: International journal of medical robotics and computer assisted surgery. Volume 17:Issue 2(2021)
• Page Start: n/a
• Page End: n/a
• Publication Date: 2020-10-26
• Subjects: C‐arm -- minimally invasive -- navigation -- pedicle screw -- robotics -- spinal surgery; Robotics in medicine -- Periodicals; Surgery -- Technological innovations -- Periodicals; Imaging systems in medicine -- Periodicals; 617.90285
• DOI: 10.1002/rcs.2182
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 1478-5951

Abstract

Abstract: Background: We assessed pedicle screw accuracy utilizing a novel navigation‐based spine surgery robotic system by comparing planned pathways with placed pathways in a porcine model. Methods: We placed three mini screws per vertebra for accuracy evaluation and used a reference frame for registration in four pigs (46 screws in 23 vertebrae). We planned screw paths and performed screw insertion under robot guidance. Using C‐arm and CT images, we evaluated accuracy by comparing the 3D distance of the placed screw head/tip from the planned screw head/tip and 3D angular offset. Results: Mean registration deviation between the preoperative 3D space (C‐arm) and postoperative CT scans was 0.475 ± 0.119 mm. The average offset from preoperative plan to final placement was 4.8 ± 2.0 mm from the head (tail), 5.3 ± 2.3 mm from the tip and 3.9 ± 2.4 degrees of angulation. Conclusions: Our spine surgery robot showed good accuracy in executing an intended planned trajectory and screw path. This faster and more accurate robotic system will be applied in future studies, first in cadavers and subsequently in the clinical field.