Current Practices in the Surgical Management of Female Stress Urinary Incontinence: A Survey of Canadian Urologists and Gynecologists. Issue 3 (May 2017)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Whoriskey, Marc; Amir, Baharak; Tennankore, Karthik; Cox, Ashley
• Is Part Of: Urology practice. Volume 4:Issue 3(2017)
• Publication Date: 2017-05
• Subjects: urinary incontinence -- stress -- surgical mesh -- surgical procedures -- operative -- suburethral slings
• DOI: 10.1016/j.urpr.2016.06.002
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 2352-0779

Abstract

Abstract : Introduction: : We assessed the practices of urologists and gynecologists who manage stress urinary incontinence surgically to examine the impact of the FDA (U.S. Food and Drug Administration) and/or Health Canada statements on pelvic floor mesh. We also determined how urologists and gynecologists manage recurrent stress urinary incontinence and complications of mesh mid urethral slings. Methods: : We conducted an online survey of urologists and gynecologists who were members of the Canadian Urological Association or Society of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists of Canada. Results: : Mid urethral sling was the most common surgery for stress urinary incontinence performed by urologists and gynecologists (100% vs 84%, p=0.0002). The majority of respondents (87%, 119 of 137) were aware of the FDA and/or Health Canada statements and 66% of physicians altered the way they counseled patients before mid urethral sling surgery. An equal proportion of urologists and gynecologists altered their surgical management of stress urinary incontinence due to patient concerns (31% vs 36%) and due to FDA and/or Health Canada statements (16% vs 13%). Repeat mid urethral sling was the most common method of treating recurrent stress urinary incontinence and urologists were more likely than gynecologists to manage complications of mid urethral sling (58% vs 41%, p=0.0286). Chronic pain (33%) and vaginal mesh erosion (26%) were the most common concerns overall. Conclusions: : Mid urethral sling was reported as the most commonly performed surgery for stress urinary incontinence by urologists and gynecologists after the FDA and Health Canada statements. Both groups altered their surgical practices most commonly due to patient concerns, indicating that negative media attention is impacting the way in which urologists and gynecologists practice when surgically managing stress urinary incontinence in Canada. Variation exists between urologists and gynecologists when it comes to managing complications related to mid urethral sling.