Competing interests, clashing ideas and institutionalizing influence: insights into the political economy of malaria control from seven African countries. Issue 1 (14th December 2020)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Parkhurst, Justin; Ghilardi, Ludovica; Webster, Jayne; Snow, Robert W; Lynch, Caroline A
• Is Part Of: Health policy and planning. Volume 36:Issue 1(2021)
• Page Start: 35
• Page End: 44
• Publication Date: 2020-12-14
• Subjects: Political economy -- malaria control -- health policy -- ideas -- interests -- institutions; Medical policy -- Developing countries -- Periodicals; Public health -- Developing countries -- Periodicals; Health planning -- Developing countries -- Periodicals; 362.1091724
• DOI: 10.1093/heapol/czaa166
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 0268-1080

Abstract

Abstract: This article explores how malaria control in sub-Saharan Africa is shaped in important ways by political and economic considerations within the contexts of aid-recipient nations and the global health community. Malaria control is often assumed to be a technically driven exercise: the remit of public health experts and epidemiologists who utilize available data to select the most effective package of activities given available resources. Yet research conducted with national and international stakeholders shows how the realities of malaria control decision-making are often more nuanced. Hegemonic ideas and interests of global actors, as well as the national and global institutional arrangements through which malaria control is funded and implemented, can all influence how national actors respond to malaria. Results from qualitative interviews in seven malaria-endemic countries indicate that malaria decision-making is constrained or directed by multiple competing objectives, including a need to balance overarching global goals with local realities, as well as a need for National Malaria Control Programmes to manage and coordinate a range of non-state stakeholders who may divide up regions and tasks within countries. Finally, beyond the influence that political and economic concerns have over programmatic decisions and action, our analysis further finds that malaria control efforts have institutionalized systems, structures and processes that may have implications for local capacity development.