Polygenic Risk Score for Low-Density Lipoprotein Cholesterol Is Associated With Risk of Ischemic Heart Disease and Enriches for Individuals With Familial Hypercholesterolemia. (February 2021)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Wu, Haoyu; Forgetta, Vincenzo; Zhou, Sirui; Bhatnagar, Sahir R.; Paré, Guillaume; Richards, J. Brent
• Is Part Of: Circulation. Volume 14:Number 1(2021)
• Publication Date: 2021-02
• Subjects: cholesterol -- epidemiology -- genetics -- heart diseases -- hypercholesterolemia; Cardiovascular system -- Diseases -- Periodicals; Cardiovascular system -- Genetics -- Periodicals; Cardiovascular Diseases -- genetics; Precision Medicine; Periodical; Fulltext; Internet Resources; Periodicals; Electronic journals; Periodicals; 616.1042
• DOI: 10.1161/CIRCGEN.120.003106
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 2574-8300

Abstract

Abstract : Background: The clinical implications of a polygenic risk score (PRS) for LDL-C (low-density lipoprotein cholesterol) are not well understood, both within the general population and individuals with familial hypercholesterolemia (FH). Methods: We developed the LDL-C PRS using Least Absolute Shrinkage and Selection Operator regression in 377 286 White British participants from UK Biobank and tested its association with LDL-C according to FH variant carrier status in another 41 748 whole-exome sequenced individuals. Next, we tested for an enrichment of FH variant carriers among individuals with severe hypercholesterolemia and low LDL-C PRS. Last, we contrasted the effect of the LDL-C PRS, measured LDL-C and FH variant carrier status on risk of ischemic heart disease among 3010 cases and 38 738 controls. Results: Among the 41 748 whole-exome sequenced White British individuals, 1-SD increase in the LDL-C PRS was associated with elevated LDL-C among both FH variant carriers (0.34 [95% CI, 0.22–0.47] mmol/L) and noncarriers (0.42 [95% CI, 0.42–0.43] mmol/L). Among individuals with severe hypercholesterolemia, FH variant carriers were enriched in those with a low LDL-C PRS (odds ratio, 2.20 [95% CI, 1.66–2.71] per SD). Each SD increase in the LDL-C PRS was associated with risk of ischemic heart disease to the comparable magnitude as measured LDL-C (odds ratio, 1.24 [95% CI, 1.20–1.29] and odds ratio, 1.15 [95% CI, 1.09–1.23], respectively). The LDL-C PRS was not strongly associated with other traditional ischemic heart disease risk factors. Conclusions: An LDL-C PRS could be used to identify individuals with a higher probability of harboring FH variants. The association between ischemic heart disease and the LDL-C PRS was comparable to measured LDL-C, likely because the PRS reflects lifetime exposure to LDL-C levels. Abstract : Supplemental Digital Content is available in the text.