What is the Image of the "Typical Cancer Patient"? The View of Physicians. Issue 2 (March 2021)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Tsiouris, Angeliki; Ungar, Nadine; Gabrian, Martina; Haussmann, Alexander; Steindorf, Karen; Wiskemann, Joachim; Sieverding, Monika
• Is Part Of: American journal of men's health. Volume 15:Issue 2(2021)
• Publication Date: 2021-03
• Subjects: cancer patient prototypes -- physicians' attitudes -- cancer patients -- gender stereotypes -- favorability; Men -- Diseases -- Periodicals; Sex factors in disease -- Periodicals; Men -- Health and hygiene -- Periodicals; Men -- Health and hygiene -- United States -- Periodicals; Men -- Medical care -- Periodicals; 362.10811
• DOI: 10.1177/1557988320988480
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 1557-9883

Abstract

Former research has identified stigmatizing attitudes toward cancer patients in the general population. Little is known about (implicit) attitudes of physicians toward cancer patients. By using the prototype approach, the study investigated German physicians' prototypical perceptions of cancer patients. Five hundred nineteen physicians (mean age: 46 years, 47% female) who regularly treat cancer patients participated in the questionnaire study. Participants were asked to state three prototype attributes that describe the "typical cancer patient." Open format answers were coded on the dimensions favorability (coded with unfavorable, favorable, or neutral ) and gender-stereotypicality (coded with masculine stereotypical, feminine stereotypical, or gender-neutral ). Of all prototype attributes ( N = 1, 589), 69.9% were coded as unfavorable and 14.3% as favorable, the remaining attributes were neutral (15.9%). Analysis of gender-stereotypicality revealed that nearly half of the attributes (49.5%) were compatible with the feminine, whereas only 6.5% were compatible with the masculine stereotype. The remaining attributes (44.0%) were gender-neutral. There were no significant associations between prototype favorability or gender-stereotypicality and demographic/professional characteristics of physicians. The prototype approach was successful to identify (implicit) attitudes toward cancer patients and might be more sensitive than social distance scales when investigating stigmatizing attitudes. Physicians described the "typical cancer patient" with predominantly unfavorable and feminine attributes, while favorable attributes were underrepresented and positive masculine attributes were barely mentioned. The finding that the "typical cancer patient" lacks (positive) masculine attributes should be followed up in further research.