Meta-analysis: combination of meropenem vs ceftazidime and amikacin for empirical treatment of cancer patients with febrile neutropenia. Issue 8 (26th February 2021)
- Record Type:
- Journal Article
- Title:
- Meta-analysis: combination of meropenem vs ceftazidime and amikacin for empirical treatment of cancer patients with febrile neutropenia. Issue 8 (26th February 2021)
- Main Title:
- Meta-analysis
- Authors:
- Wang, Ying
Du, Zhichao
Chen, Yongdong
Liu, Yugang
Yang, Zhitang - Other Names:
- Sun. YX section editor.
- Abstract:
- Abstract: Background: Meropenem monotherapy vs ceftazidime plus amikacin have been approved for use against febrile neutropenia. To assess the effectiveness and safety of them for empirical treatment of cancer patients with febrile neutropenia, we conducted a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trial. Methods: Randomized controlled trials on ceftazidime plus amikacin, or/and monotherapy with meropenem for the treatment of cancer patients with febrile neutropenia were identified by searching Cochrane Library, PubMed, Science Direct, Wiley Online, Science Citation Index, Google (scholar), National Center for Biotechnology Information, and China National Knowledge Infrastructure. Data on interventions, participants' characteristics and the outcomes of therapy, were extracted for statistical analysis. Seven trials fulfilled the inclusion criteria. Result: The treatment with ceftazidime plus amikacin was more effective than meropenem (OR = 1.17; 95% CI 0.93–1.46; 1270 participants). However, the treatment effects of the 2 therapy methods were almost parallel in adults (OR = 1.15; 95% CI 0.91–1.46; 1130 participants older than 16). Drug-related adverse effects afflicted more patients treated with ceftazidime plus amikacin (OR = 0.78; 95% CI 0.52–1.15; 1445 participants). The common responses were nausea, diarrhea, rash, and increased in serum glutamic oxaloacetic transaminase, serum glutamic pyruvic transaminase and bilirubin. Conclusion: Ceftazidime plus amikacin should be theAbstract: Background: Meropenem monotherapy vs ceftazidime plus amikacin have been approved for use against febrile neutropenia. To assess the effectiveness and safety of them for empirical treatment of cancer patients with febrile neutropenia, we conducted a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trial. Methods: Randomized controlled trials on ceftazidime plus amikacin, or/and monotherapy with meropenem for the treatment of cancer patients with febrile neutropenia were identified by searching Cochrane Library, PubMed, Science Direct, Wiley Online, Science Citation Index, Google (scholar), National Center for Biotechnology Information, and China National Knowledge Infrastructure. Data on interventions, participants' characteristics and the outcomes of therapy, were extracted for statistical analysis. Seven trials fulfilled the inclusion criteria. Result: The treatment with ceftazidime plus amikacin was more effective than meropenem (OR = 1.17; 95% CI 0.93–1.46; 1270 participants). However, the treatment effects of the 2 therapy methods were almost parallel in adults (OR = 1.15; 95% CI 0.91–1.46; 1130 participants older than 16). Drug-related adverse effects afflicted more patients treated with ceftazidime plus amikacin (OR = 0.78; 95% CI 0.52–1.15; 1445 participants). The common responses were nausea, diarrhea, rash, and increased in serum glutamic oxaloacetic transaminase, serum glutamic pyruvic transaminase and bilirubin. Conclusion: Ceftazidime plus amikacin should be the first choice for empirical treatment of cancer patients with febrile neutropenia, and meropenem may be chosen as a last defense against pathogenic bacteria. … (more)
- Is Part Of:
- Medicine. Volume 100:Issue 8(2021)
- Journal:
- Medicine
- Issue:
- Volume 100:Issue 8(2021)
- Issue Display:
- Volume 100, Issue 8 (2021)
- Year:
- 2021
- Volume:
- 100
- Issue:
- 8
- Issue Sort Value:
- 2021-0100-0008-0000
- Page Start:
- Page End:
- Publication Date:
- 2021-02-26
- Subjects:
- amikacin -- ceftazidime -- febrile neutropenia -- meropenem -- meta-analysis
Medicine -- Periodicals
Medicine -- Periodicals
Médecine -- Périodiques
Geneeskunde
Medicine
Periodicals
Periodicals
610.5 - Journal URLs:
- http://journals.lww.com/md-journal/pages/default.aspx ↗
http://gateway.ovid.com/ovidweb.cgi?T=JS&PAGE=toc&D=ovft&MODE=ovid&NEWS=N&AN=00002060-000000000-00000 ↗
http://journals.lww.com ↗ - DOI:
- 10.1097/MD.0000000000024883 ↗
- Languages:
- English
- ISSNs:
- 0025-7974
- Deposit Type:
- Legaldeposit
- View Content:
- Available online (eLD content is only available in our Reading Rooms) ↗
- Physical Locations:
- British Library DSC - 5534.000000
British Library DSC - BLDSS-3PM
British Library STI - ELD Digital store - Ingest File:
- 15949.xml