An In‐Depth Analysis of Patient‐Reported Outcomes in Patients With Chronic Hepatitis C Treated With Different Anti‐Viral Regimens. (June 2016)
- Record Type:
- Journal Article
- Title:
- An In‐Depth Analysis of Patient‐Reported Outcomes in Patients With Chronic Hepatitis C Treated With Different Anti‐Viral Regimens. (June 2016)
- Main Title:
- An In‐Depth Analysis of Patient‐Reported Outcomes in Patients With Chronic Hepatitis C Treated With Different Anti‐Viral Regimens
- Authors:
- Younossi, Zobair M
Stepanova, Maria
Henry, Linda
Nader, Fatema
Hunt, Sharon - Abstract:
- Abstract : OBJECTIVES: Interferon‐ and ribavirin (RBV)‐containing regimens negatively impact patients' experience. The aim of this study was to quantify the impact of different anti‐viral regimens for hepatitis C on patients' work productivity, fatigue, and other patient‐reported outcomes (PROs). METHODS: The PRO data from multicenter multinational phase 3 clinical trials of sofosbuvir with and without interferon or RBV were retrospectively used. Treatment regimens were classified as interferon+RBV‐containing, interferon‐free RBV‐containing, and interferon‐free RBV‐free. Four PRO instruments (SF‐36, CLDQ‐HCV, FACIT‐F, and WPAI:SHP) were administered to subjects at baseline, during, and up to 24 weeks after treatment. RESULTS: We included 3, 425 subjects with chronic hepatitis C infection with PRO data. Patients were 62.8% male, 62.2% treatment naive, 18.1% with cirrhosis, and 72.9% with HCV genotype 1. Of the study participants, 546 received interferon+RBV+sofosbuvir, 1, 721 received sofosbuvir+RBV, and 1, 158 received interferon‐ and RBV‐free ledipasvir+sofosbuvir. At baseline, there were no difference in PROs between treatment groups (all P >0.01). During treatment, the decrements in PROs were up to −23.6% for the interferon+RBV group, up to −7.0% in the sofosbuvir+RBV group, whereas there was an improvement of up to +11.6% in the interferon‐free RBV‐free group (all P <0.0001). In multivariate analysis, the use of interferon was independently associated with up to −26.0%Abstract : OBJECTIVES: Interferon‐ and ribavirin (RBV)‐containing regimens negatively impact patients' experience. The aim of this study was to quantify the impact of different anti‐viral regimens for hepatitis C on patients' work productivity, fatigue, and other patient‐reported outcomes (PROs). METHODS: The PRO data from multicenter multinational phase 3 clinical trials of sofosbuvir with and without interferon or RBV were retrospectively used. Treatment regimens were classified as interferon+RBV‐containing, interferon‐free RBV‐containing, and interferon‐free RBV‐free. Four PRO instruments (SF‐36, CLDQ‐HCV, FACIT‐F, and WPAI:SHP) were administered to subjects at baseline, during, and up to 24 weeks after treatment. RESULTS: We included 3, 425 subjects with chronic hepatitis C infection with PRO data. Patients were 62.8% male, 62.2% treatment naive, 18.1% with cirrhosis, and 72.9% with HCV genotype 1. Of the study participants, 546 received interferon+RBV+sofosbuvir, 1, 721 received sofosbuvir+RBV, and 1, 158 received interferon‐ and RBV‐free ledipasvir+sofosbuvir. At baseline, there were no difference in PROs between treatment groups (all P >0.01). During treatment, the decrements in PROs were up to −23.6% for the interferon+RBV group, up to −7.0% in the sofosbuvir+RBV group, whereas there was an improvement of up to +11.6% in the interferon‐free RBV‐free group (all P <0.0001). In multivariate analysis, the use of interferon was independently associated with up to −26.0% worsening of the PRO scores during treatment and the use of RBV with up to −9.0% worsening. After 12 weeks post‐treatment, in patients with sustained virologic response‐12, improvements were observed regardless of the regimen, and these improvements continued to increase by week 24 of follow‐up. CONCLUSIONS: The use of interferon‐ and RBV‐free regimens for HCV is associated with better patients' experience and work productivity during treatment. … (more)
- Is Part Of:
- American journal of gastroenterology. Volume 111:Number 6(2016)
- Journal:
- American journal of gastroenterology
- Issue:
- Volume 111:Number 6(2016)
- Issue Display:
- Volume 111, Issue 6 (2016)
- Year:
- 2016
- Volume:
- 111
- Issue:
- 6
- Issue Sort Value:
- 2016-0111-0006-0000
- Page Start:
- Page End:
- Publication Date:
- 2016-06
- Subjects:
- Stomach -- Diseases -- Periodicals
Intestines -- Diseases -- Periodicals
Gastroenterology -- Periodicals
Gastrointestinal Diseases -- Periodicals
Electronic journals
Periodicals
616.33 - Journal URLs:
- http://www.mdconsult.com/public/search?search_type=journal&j_sort=pub_date&j_date_range=1995-current&j_issn=0002-9270 ↗
http://www.amjgastro.com/ ↗
http://www.nature.com/ajg/archive/index.html ↗
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/journal/00029270 ↗
http://www.nature.com/ ↗
http://www3.interscience.wiley.com/journal/117955841/home ↗
http://firstsearch.oclc.org ↗
http://firstsearch.oclc.org/journal=0002-9270;screen=info;ECOIP ↗ - DOI:
- 10.1038/ajg.2016.99 ↗
- Languages:
- English
- ISSNs:
- 0002-9270
- Deposit Type:
- Legaldeposit
- View Content:
- Available online (eLD content is only available in our Reading Rooms) ↗
- Physical Locations:
- British Library DSC - 0824.650000
British Library DSC - BLDSS-3PM
British Library HMNTS - ELD Digital store - Ingest File:
- 15942.xml