Levofloxacin Sequential Therapy vs Levofloxacin Triple Therapy in the Second‐Line Treatment of Helicobacter pylori: A Randomized Trial. (March 2016)
- Record Type:
- Journal Article
- Title:
- Levofloxacin Sequential Therapy vs Levofloxacin Triple Therapy in the Second‐Line Treatment of Helicobacter pylori: A Randomized Trial. (March 2016)
- Main Title:
- Levofloxacin Sequential Therapy vs Levofloxacin Triple Therapy in the Second‐Line Treatment of Helicobacter pylori: A Randomized Trial
- Authors:
- Liou, Jyh‐Ming
Bair, Ming‐Jong
Chen, Chieh‐Chang
Lee, Yi‐Chia
Chen, Mei‐Jyh
Chen, Chien‐Chuan
Tseng, Cheng‐Hao
Fang, Yu‐Jen
Lee, Ji‐Yuh
Yang, Tsung‐Hua
Luo, Jiing‐Chyuan
Wu, Jeng‐Yih
Chang, Wen‐Hsiung
Chang, Chun‐Chao
Chen, Chi‐Yi
Chen, Po‐Yueh
Shun, Chia‐Tung
Hsu, Wen‐Feng
Hung, Hsu‐Wei
Lin, Jaw‐Town
Chang, Chi‐Yang
Wu, Ming‐Shiang - Abstract:
- Abstract : Objectives: The efficacy of levofloxacin triple therapy has fallen below 80% in the second‐line treatment of Helicobacter pylori (H. pylori). We aimed to assess whether the levofloxacin sequential therapy is more effective than levofloxacin triple therapy in the second‐line treatment. Methods: This open‐label, randomized, multicenter trial was conducted between 2012 and 2015. H. pylori ‐infected subjects who failed from clarithromycin‐based regimens ( N =600) were randomized (1:1) to receive levofloxacin sequential therapy (LS: lansoprazole and amoxicillin for the first 5 days, followed by lansoprazole, levofloxacin, and metronidazole for another 5 days) or levofloxacin triple therapy (LT: lansoprazole, amoxicillin, and levofloxacin for 10 days). Successful eradication was defined as negative 13 C‐urea breath test at least 6 weeks after treatment. Our primary outcome was the eradication rate by intention‐to‐treat (ITT) and per‐protocol (PP) analyses. Antibiotic resistance was determined by agar dilution test. Results: The prevalence of clarithromycin, levofloxacin, and metronidazole resistance was 60, 17.6, and 36.9%, respectively. The eradication rates of LS and LT were 84.3% (253/300) and 75.3% (226/300), respectively, in the ITT analysis ( P =0.006) and 86.3% (253/293) and 78.8% (223/283), respectively, in the PP analysis ( P =0.021). The efficacies of both LS and LT were affected by levofloxacin resistance. The secondary resistance of levofloxacin was 66.7 andAbstract : Objectives: The efficacy of levofloxacin triple therapy has fallen below 80% in the second‐line treatment of Helicobacter pylori (H. pylori). We aimed to assess whether the levofloxacin sequential therapy is more effective than levofloxacin triple therapy in the second‐line treatment. Methods: This open‐label, randomized, multicenter trial was conducted between 2012 and 2015. H. pylori ‐infected subjects who failed from clarithromycin‐based regimens ( N =600) were randomized (1:1) to receive levofloxacin sequential therapy (LS: lansoprazole and amoxicillin for the first 5 days, followed by lansoprazole, levofloxacin, and metronidazole for another 5 days) or levofloxacin triple therapy (LT: lansoprazole, amoxicillin, and levofloxacin for 10 days). Successful eradication was defined as negative 13 C‐urea breath test at least 6 weeks after treatment. Our primary outcome was the eradication rate by intention‐to‐treat (ITT) and per‐protocol (PP) analyses. Antibiotic resistance was determined by agar dilution test. Results: The prevalence of clarithromycin, levofloxacin, and metronidazole resistance was 60, 17.6, and 36.9%, respectively. The eradication rates of LS and LT were 84.3% (253/300) and 75.3% (226/300), respectively, in the ITT analysis ( P =0.006) and 86.3% (253/293) and 78.8% (223/283), respectively, in the PP analysis ( P =0.021). The efficacies of both LS and LT were affected by levofloxacin resistance. The secondary resistance of levofloxacin was 66.7 and 73.9% after LS and LT, respectively. The efficacies of LS and LT were not affected by the CYP2C19 polymorphism. Conclusions: Levofloxacin sequential therapy was more effective than levofloxacin triple therapy, and it is recommended in the second‐line treatment for H. pylori (Trial registration number: NCT01537055). … (more)
- Is Part Of:
- American journal of gastroenterology. Volume 111:Number 3(2016)
- Journal:
- American journal of gastroenterology
- Issue:
- Volume 111:Number 3(2016)
- Issue Display:
- Volume 111, Issue 3 (2016)
- Year:
- 2016
- Volume:
- 111
- Issue:
- 3
- Issue Sort Value:
- 2016-0111-0003-0000
- Page Start:
- Page End:
- Publication Date:
- 2016-03
- Subjects:
- Stomach -- Diseases -- Periodicals
Intestines -- Diseases -- Periodicals
Gastroenterology -- Periodicals
Gastrointestinal Diseases -- Periodicals
Electronic journals
Periodicals
616.33 - Journal URLs:
- http://www.mdconsult.com/public/search?search_type=journal&j_sort=pub_date&j_date_range=1995-current&j_issn=0002-9270 ↗
http://www.amjgastro.com/ ↗
http://www.nature.com/ajg/archive/index.html ↗
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/journal/00029270 ↗
http://www.nature.com/ ↗
http://www3.interscience.wiley.com/journal/117955841/home ↗
http://firstsearch.oclc.org ↗
http://firstsearch.oclc.org/journal=0002-9270;screen=info;ECOIP ↗ - DOI:
- 10.1038/ajg.2015.439 ↗
- Languages:
- English
- ISSNs:
- 0002-9270
- Deposit Type:
- Legaldeposit
- View Content:
- Available online (eLD content is only available in our Reading Rooms) ↗
- Physical Locations:
- British Library DSC - 0824.650000
British Library DSC - BLDSS-3PM
British Library HMNTS - ELD Digital store - Ingest File:
- 15937.xml