The Periscreen Strip Is Highly Efficient for the Exclusion of Spontaneous Bacterial Peritonitis in Cirrhotic Outpatients. (October 2016)
- Record Type:
- Journal Article
- Title:
- The Periscreen Strip Is Highly Efficient for the Exclusion of Spontaneous Bacterial Peritonitis in Cirrhotic Outpatients. (October 2016)
- Main Title:
- The Periscreen Strip Is Highly Efficient for the Exclusion of Spontaneous Bacterial Peritonitis in Cirrhotic Outpatients
- Authors:
- Thévenot, Thierry
Briot, Charline
Macé, Vincent
Lison, Hortensia
Elkrief, Laure
Heurgué‐Berlot, Alexandra
Bureau, Christophe
Jézéquel, Caroline
Riachi, Ghassan
Louvet, Alexandre
Pauwels, Arnaud
Ollivier‐Hourmand, Isabelle
Anty, Rodolphe
Carbonell, Nicolas
Labadie, Hélène
Aziz, Karim
Grasset, Denis
Nguyen‐Khac, Eric
Kaassis, Mehdi
Hermann, Sofia
Tanné, Florence
Mouillot, Thomas
Roux, Olivier
Le Thuaut, Aurélie
Cervoni, Jean‐Paul
Cadranel, Jean‐François
Schnee, Matthieu - Abstract:
- Abstract : Objectives: We aimed to assess the performance of a new strip (Periscreen) for the rapid diagnosis of spontaneous bacterial peritonitis (SBP). Methods: Ascitic fluid (AF) of cirrhotic patients hospitalized between March 2014 and August 2015 was independently tested by two readers using the new strip, which has four colorimetric graduations (negative, trace, small, and large). SBP was diagnosed on neutrophils in ascites>250/mm 3 . Ascites not related to portal hypertension were excluded. Results: Overall, 649 patients from 21 French centers were included and 1, 402 AF (803 AF samples from 315 outpatients and 599 samples from 334 inpatients) were assessed. Eighty‐four AF samples (17 AF in 9 outpatients and 67 AF in 31 inpatients) were diagnosed as SBP. The prevalence of SBP was 6% (2.1% in outpatients vs. 11.2% in inpatients; P <0.001) and 7.2% in patients with symptoms suggestive of SBP (3% in outpatients vs. 11.3% in inpatients; P <0.001). The κ value for inter‐reader agreement was 0.81 (95% confidence interval: 0.77–0.84) when using the "trace" threshold. Considering discordant results ( n =131) as positive to interpret the diagnostic performance of the strip at the "trace" threshold, sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV), and negative predictive value (NPV) were 91.7, 57.1, 12.0, and 99.1%, respectively. At this "trace" threshold, sensitivity and NPV were both 100% in outpatients, and 89.5 and 97.9% in inpatients, respectively. At the "small"Abstract : Objectives: We aimed to assess the performance of a new strip (Periscreen) for the rapid diagnosis of spontaneous bacterial peritonitis (SBP). Methods: Ascitic fluid (AF) of cirrhotic patients hospitalized between March 2014 and August 2015 was independently tested by two readers using the new strip, which has four colorimetric graduations (negative, trace, small, and large). SBP was diagnosed on neutrophils in ascites>250/mm 3 . Ascites not related to portal hypertension were excluded. Results: Overall, 649 patients from 21 French centers were included and 1, 402 AF (803 AF samples from 315 outpatients and 599 samples from 334 inpatients) were assessed. Eighty‐four AF samples (17 AF in 9 outpatients and 67 AF in 31 inpatients) were diagnosed as SBP. The prevalence of SBP was 6% (2.1% in outpatients vs. 11.2% in inpatients; P <0.001) and 7.2% in patients with symptoms suggestive of SBP (3% in outpatients vs. 11.3% in inpatients; P <0.001). The κ value for inter‐reader agreement was 0.81 (95% confidence interval: 0.77–0.84) when using the "trace" threshold. Considering discordant results ( n =131) as positive to interpret the diagnostic performance of the strip at the "trace" threshold, sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV), and negative predictive value (NPV) were 91.7, 57.1, 12.0, and 99.1%, respectively. At this "trace" threshold, sensitivity and NPV were both 100% in outpatients, and 89.5 and 97.9% in inpatients, respectively. At the "small" threshold, sensitivity, specificity, PPV and NPV were 81.0, 85.9, 25.9 and 98.7%, respectively. Conclusions: The Periscreen strip is a rapid and highly efficient tool for excluding SBP in the outpatient setting. … (more)
- Is Part Of:
- American journal of gastroenterology. Volume 111:Number 10(2016)
- Journal:
- American journal of gastroenterology
- Issue:
- Volume 111:Number 10(2016)
- Issue Display:
- Volume 111, Issue 10 (2016)
- Year:
- 2016
- Volume:
- 111
- Issue:
- 10
- Issue Sort Value:
- 2016-0111-0010-0000
- Page Start:
- Page End:
- Publication Date:
- 2016-10
- Subjects:
- Stomach -- Diseases -- Periodicals
Intestines -- Diseases -- Periodicals
Gastroenterology -- Periodicals
Gastrointestinal Diseases -- Periodicals
Electronic journals
Periodicals
616.33 - Journal URLs:
- http://www.mdconsult.com/public/search?search_type=journal&j_sort=pub_date&j_date_range=1995-current&j_issn=0002-9270 ↗
http://www.amjgastro.com/ ↗
http://www.nature.com/ajg/archive/index.html ↗
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/journal/00029270 ↗
http://www.nature.com/ ↗
http://www3.interscience.wiley.com/journal/117955841/home ↗
http://firstsearch.oclc.org ↗
http://firstsearch.oclc.org/journal=0002-9270;screen=info;ECOIP ↗ - DOI:
- 10.1038/ajg.2016.344 ↗
- Languages:
- English
- ISSNs:
- 0002-9270
- Deposit Type:
- Legaldeposit
- View Content:
- Available online (eLD content is only available in our Reading Rooms) ↗
- Physical Locations:
- British Library DSC - 0824.650000
British Library DSC - BLDSS-3PM
British Library HMNTS - ELD Digital store - Ingest File:
- 15925.xml