Can policy-packaging increase public support for costly policies? Insights from a choice experiment on policies against vehicle emissions. (24th December 2020)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Wicki, Michael; Huber, Robert Alexander; Bernauer, Thomas
• Is Part Of: Journal of public policy. Volume 40:Number 4(2020)
• Page Start: 599
• Page End: 625
• Publication Date: 2020-12-24
• Subjects: ancillary measures, -- command-and-control measures, -- conjoint experiment, -- market-based regulation, -- public opinion, -- transportation policy; Policy sciences -- Periodicals; 351.007205
• DOI: 10.1017/S0143814X19000205
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 0143-814X

Abstract

Abstract: Public support is usually a precondition for the adoption and successful implementation of costly policies. We argue that such support is easier to achieve with policy-packages that incorporate primary and ancillary measures. We specifically distinguish command-and-control and market-based measures as primary measures and argue that the former will usually garner more public support than the latter given the low-visibility tendency of costs associated with command-and-control measures. Nevertheless, if included in a policy-package, ancillary measures are likely to increase public support by reducing negative effects of primary measures. Based on a choice experiment with a representative sample of 2, 034 Swiss citizens, we assessed these arguments with respect to political efforts to reduce vehicle emissions. The empirical analysis supported the argument that policy-packaging affects public support positively, particularly generating more support when ancillary measures are added. Lastly, we ultimately observe that command-and-control measures obtain more public support than market-based instruments.