Ventilation and air cleaning to limit aerosol particle concentrations in a gym during the COVID-19 pandemic. (15th April 2021)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Blocken, B.; van Druenen, T.; Ricci, A.; Kang, L.; van Hooff, T.; Qin, P.; Xia, L.; Ruiz, C. Alanis; Arts, J.H.; Diepens, J.F.L.; Maas, G.A.; Gillmeier, S.G.; Vos, S.B.; Brombacher, A.C.
• Is Part Of: Building and environment. Volume 193(2021)
• Publication Date: 2021-04-15
• Subjects: COVID-19 -- Aerosol -- Sports club -- Fitness center -- Building ventilation -- Air purifier; Buildings -- Environmental engineering -- Periodicals; Building -- Research -- Periodicals; Constructions -- Technique de l'environnement -- Périodiques; Electronic journals; 696
• DOI: 10.1016/j.buildenv.2021.107659
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 0360-1323

Abstract

Abstract: SARS-CoV-2 can spread by close contact through large droplet spray and indirect contact via contaminated objects. There is mounting evidence that it can also be transmitted by inhalation of infected saliva aerosol particles. These particles are generated when breathing, talking, laughing, coughing or sneezing. It can be assumed that aerosol particle concentrations should be kept low in order to minimize the potential risk of airborne virus transmission. This paper presents measurements of aerosol particle concentrations in a gym, where saliva aerosol production is pronounced. 35 test persons performed physical exercise and aerosol particle concentrations, CO2 concentrations, air temperature and relative humidity were obtained in the room of 886 m³. A separate test was used to discriminate between human endogenous and exogenous aerosol particles. Aerosol particle removal by mechanical ventilation and mobile air cleaning units was measured. The gym test showed that ventilation with air-change rate ACH = 2.2 h −1, i.e. 4.5 times the minimum of the Dutch Building Code, was insufficient to stop the significant aerosol concentration rise over 30 min. Air cleaning alone with ACH = 1.39 h −1 had a similar effect as ventilation alone. Simplified mathematical models were engaged to provide further insight into ventilation, air cleaning and deposition. It was shown that combining the above-mentioned ventilation and air cleaning can reduce aerosol particle concentrations with 80 to 90%, depending on aerosol size. This combination of existing ventilation supplemented with air cleaning is energy efficient and can also be applied for other indoor environments. Highlights: Aerosol particle concentration measurements in a gym with 35 exercising persons. Assessment of deposition, ventilation and air cleaning (AC) for aerosol reduction. Gym ventilation with ACH = 2.2 h −1 has similar effect as air cleaning with ACH = 1.39 h −1 . Application of simplified mathematical models to predict other scenarios. Combining ventilation & AC gives reduction factors 2.3 up to 3.7 depending on aerosol size.