Field Evaluation of Column CO2 Retrievals From Intensity‐Modulated Continuous‐Wave Differential Absorption Lidar Measurements During the ACT‐America Campaign. Issue 12 (8th December 2020)
- Record Type:
- Journal Article
- Title:
- Field Evaluation of Column CO2 Retrievals From Intensity‐Modulated Continuous‐Wave Differential Absorption Lidar Measurements During the ACT‐America Campaign. Issue 12 (8th December 2020)
- Main Title:
- Field Evaluation of Column CO2 Retrievals From Intensity‐Modulated Continuous‐Wave Differential Absorption Lidar Measurements During the ACT‐America Campaign
- Authors:
- Campbell, Joel F.
Lin, Bing
Dobler, Jeremy
Pal, Sandip
Davis, Kenneth
Obland, Michael D.
Erxleben, Wayne
McGregor, Doug
O'Dell, Chris
Bell, Emily
Weir, Brad
Fan, Tai‐Fang
Kooi, Susan
Gordon, Iouli
Corbett, Abigail
Kochanov, Roman - Abstract:
- Abstract: We present an evaluation of airborne intensity‐modulated continuous‐wave (IM‐CW) lidar measurements of atmospheric column CO2 mole fractions during the Atmospheric Carbon and Transport–America (ACT‐America) project. This lidar system transmits online and offline wavelengths simultaneously on the 1.57111‐μm CO2 absorption line, with each modulated wavelength using orthogonal swept frequency waveforms. After the spectral characteristics of this system were calibrated through short‐path measurements, we used the HITRAN spectroscopic database to calculate the average‐column CO2 mole fraction (XCO2 ) from the lidar‐measured optical depths. Using in situ measurements of meteorological parameters and CO2 concentrations for calibration data, we demonstrate that our lidar CO2 measurements were consistent from season to season and had an absolute calibration error (standard deviation) of 0.80 ppm when compared to XCO2 values calculated from in situ measurements. By using a 10‐s or longer moving average, a precision of 1 ppm or better was obtained. The estimated CO2 measurement precision for 0.1‐, 1‐, 10‐, and 60‐s averages was determined to be 3.4, 1.2, 0.43, and 0.26 ppm, respectively. These correspond to measurement signal‐to‐noise ratios of 120, 330, 950, and 1, 600, respectively. The drift in XCO2 over 1‐hr of flight time was found to be below 0.1 ppm. These analyses demonstrate that the measurement stability, precision, and accuracy are all well below the thresholdsAbstract: We present an evaluation of airborne intensity‐modulated continuous‐wave (IM‐CW) lidar measurements of atmospheric column CO2 mole fractions during the Atmospheric Carbon and Transport–America (ACT‐America) project. This lidar system transmits online and offline wavelengths simultaneously on the 1.57111‐μm CO2 absorption line, with each modulated wavelength using orthogonal swept frequency waveforms. After the spectral characteristics of this system were calibrated through short‐path measurements, we used the HITRAN spectroscopic database to calculate the average‐column CO2 mole fraction (XCO2 ) from the lidar‐measured optical depths. Using in situ measurements of meteorological parameters and CO2 concentrations for calibration data, we demonstrate that our lidar CO2 measurements were consistent from season to season and had an absolute calibration error (standard deviation) of 0.80 ppm when compared to XCO2 values calculated from in situ measurements. By using a 10‐s or longer moving average, a precision of 1 ppm or better was obtained. The estimated CO2 measurement precision for 0.1‐, 1‐, 10‐, and 60‐s averages was determined to be 3.4, 1.2, 0.43, and 0.26 ppm, respectively. These correspond to measurement signal‐to‐noise ratios of 120, 330, 950, and 1, 600, respectively. The drift in XCO2 over 1‐hr of flight time was found to be below 0.1 ppm. These analyses demonstrate that the measurement stability, precision, and accuracy are all well below the thresholds needed to study synoptic‐scale variations in atmospheric XCO2 . Key Points: Demonstrate the MFLL laser spectrometer for use in column CO2 retrievals Demonstrate the viability of this instrument for use in ACT America project goals Provide a methodology for doing CO2 or perhaps other types of retrievals using lidar … (more)
- Is Part Of:
- Earth and space science. Volume 7:Issue 12(2020)
- Journal:
- Earth and space science
- Issue:
- Volume 7:Issue 12(2020)
- Issue Display:
- Volume 7, Issue 12 (2020)
- Year:
- 2020
- Volume:
- 7
- Issue:
- 12
- Issue Sort Value:
- 2020-0007-0012-0000
- Page Start:
- n/a
- Page End:
- n/a
- Publication Date:
- 2020-12-08
- Subjects:
- absorption -- CO2 -- instrumentation -- laser -- lidar -- spectroscopy
Space sciences -- Periodicals
Geophysics -- Periodicals
500.5 - Journal URLs:
- http://agupubs.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/agu/journal/10.1002/(ISSN)2333-5084/ ↗
http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/ ↗ - DOI:
- 10.1029/2019EA000847 ↗
- Languages:
- English
- ISSNs:
- 2333-5084
- Deposit Type:
- Legaldeposit
- View Content:
- Available online (eLD content is only available in our Reading Rooms) ↗
- Physical Locations:
- British Library DSC - BLDSS-3PM
British Library HMNTS - ELD Digital store - Ingest File:
- 15874.xml