Prophylactic clipping not effective in preventing post‐polypectomy bleeding for < 20‐mm colon polyps: A multicenter, open‐label, randomized controlled trial. Issue 2 (29th July 2020)
- Record Type:
- Journal Article
- Title:
- Prophylactic clipping not effective in preventing post‐polypectomy bleeding for < 20‐mm colon polyps: A multicenter, open‐label, randomized controlled trial. Issue 2 (29th July 2020)
- Main Title:
- Prophylactic clipping not effective in preventing post‐polypectomy bleeding for < 20‐mm colon polyps: A multicenter, open‐label, randomized controlled trial
- Authors:
- Inoue, Takuya
Ishihara, Ryu
Nishida, Tsutomu
Akasaka, Tomofumi
Hayashi, Yoshito
Nakamatsu, Dai
Ogiyama, Hideharu
Yamaguchi, Shinjiro
Yamamoto, Katsumi
Mukai, Akira
Kinoshita, Kazuo
Yakushijin, Takayuki
Iijima, Hideki
Takehara, Tetsuo - Other Names:
- Chiu Han‐Mo guestEditor.
- Abstract:
- Abstract: Background and Aim: Prophylactic clipping (PC) after polypectomy has the potential to prevent post‐polypectomy bleeding (PPB). We aimed to evaluate the effectiveness of PC in preventing PPB for < 20‐mm polyps. Methods: This multicenter, open‐label, randomized controlled trial conducted from December 2013 to June 2017 at 10 institutions randomly assigned 1080 patients with < 20‐mm colon polyps to the non‐PC and PC groups. Allocation factors were institution, antiplatelet drug use, and polyp number. The primary endpoint was differences in PPB rates between the groups. The severity of PPB and post‐procedural abdominal symptoms were also investigated. These endpoints in intention‐to‐treat and per‐protocol (PP) analyses were evaluated. Results: We investigated 1039 patients with 2960 lesions. There was no significant difference between the groups in characteristics including age, sex, hypertension, diabetes, hyperlipidemia, antiplatelet drug use, and lesion characteristics such as type and size. Excluding the clip used in the non‐PC group, intraoperative bleeding, and deviation of protocol, 903 patients were investigated in PP analysis. There was no significant difference in the PPB rate between the non‐PC and PC groups (2.7% vs 2.3%, P = 0.6973 [intention‐to‐treat analysis]; 3.0 vs 2.4%, P = 0.7353 [PP analysis]). Severe PPB (≥ grade 3) was similar between the groups. Total procedure time was significantly shorter in the non‐PC group than in the PC group (31 vsAbstract: Background and Aim: Prophylactic clipping (PC) after polypectomy has the potential to prevent post‐polypectomy bleeding (PPB). We aimed to evaluate the effectiveness of PC in preventing PPB for < 20‐mm polyps. Methods: This multicenter, open‐label, randomized controlled trial conducted from December 2013 to June 2017 at 10 institutions randomly assigned 1080 patients with < 20‐mm colon polyps to the non‐PC and PC groups. Allocation factors were institution, antiplatelet drug use, and polyp number. The primary endpoint was differences in PPB rates between the groups. The severity of PPB and post‐procedural abdominal symptoms were also investigated. These endpoints in intention‐to‐treat and per‐protocol (PP) analyses were evaluated. Results: We investigated 1039 patients with 2960 lesions. There was no significant difference between the groups in characteristics including age, sex, hypertension, diabetes, hyperlipidemia, antiplatelet drug use, and lesion characteristics such as type and size. Excluding the clip used in the non‐PC group, intraoperative bleeding, and deviation of protocol, 903 patients were investigated in PP analysis. There was no significant difference in the PPB rate between the non‐PC and PC groups (2.7% vs 2.3%, P = 0.6973 [intention‐to‐treat analysis]; 3.0 vs 2.4%, P = 0.7353 [PP analysis]). Severe PPB (≥ grade 3) was similar between the groups. Total procedure time was significantly shorter in the non‐PC group than in the PC group (31 vs 36 min, P = 0.0002). Post‐procedural abdominal fullness was less common in the non‐PC group than in the PC group (20.8% vs 25.6%, P = 0.0833). Conclusion: Prophylactic clipping is not effective in preventing PBB for < 20‐mm colon polyps (UMIN000012163). … (more)
- Is Part Of:
- Journal of gastroenterology and hepatology. Volume 36:Issue 2(2021)
- Journal:
- Journal of gastroenterology and hepatology
- Issue:
- Volume 36:Issue 2(2021)
- Issue Display:
- Volume 36, Issue 2 (2021)
- Year:
- 2021
- Volume:
- 36
- Issue:
- 2
- Issue Sort Value:
- 2021-0036-0002-0000
- Page Start:
- 383
- Page End:
- 390
- Publication Date:
- 2020-07-29
- Subjects:
- Colon polyps -- Post‐polypectomy bleeding -- Prophylactic clipping
Gastroenterology -- Periodicals
Digestive organs -- Diseases -- Periodicals
Liver -- Diseases -- Periodicals
Gastroenterology -- Periodicals
Liver Diseases -- Periodicals
616.33 - Journal URLs:
- http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/journal/10.1111/(ISSN)1440-1746 ↗
http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/ ↗
http://www.blackwell-synergy.com/loi/jgh ↗ - DOI:
- 10.1111/jgh.15134 ↗
- Languages:
- English
- ISSNs:
- 0815-9319
- Deposit Type:
- Legaldeposit
- View Content:
- Available online (eLD content is only available in our Reading Rooms) ↗
- Physical Locations:
- British Library DSC - 4987.615000
British Library DSC - BLDSS-3PM
British Library HMNTS - ELD Digital store - Ingest File:
- 15876.xml