A comparative assessment of different interpolation algorithms for prediction of GNSS/levelling geoid surface using scattered control data. (March 2021)
- Record Type:
- Journal Article
- Title:
- A comparative assessment of different interpolation algorithms for prediction of GNSS/levelling geoid surface using scattered control data. (March 2021)
- Main Title:
- A comparative assessment of different interpolation algorithms for prediction of GNSS/levelling geoid surface using scattered control data
- Authors:
- Erol, Serdar
Erol, Bihter - Abstract:
- Highlights: Different interpolation algorithms can be employed in modelling the local geoid. MPR method expressed the model area with a single easy-use parametric function. LSC is a stochastic method filters noise in the data, hence gives rigorous results. WNN is a non-linear method, gives high accuracy. FEM based BIVAR algorithm is superior both in accuracy and for surface continuity. Abstract: The determination of point heights from a physical reference surface is still a challenge in geodetic and surveying applications today. Precise geoid models are used to obtain the physical point heights from the GNSS observations with height transformation. The precision of the geoid model mainly depends on the employed calculation method of the geoid as well as the accuracy, density, and distribution of the used data. This study provides a comprehensive comparison of four surface interpolation methods having different mathematical backgrounds in local geoid modeling, in the west of Turkey. In the tests, high accuracy GNSS/leveling data at the scattered control benchmarks on topography were used. The tested algorithms are multivariable polynomial regression (MPR) analysis with least-squares adjustment (LSA), stochastic based least-squares collocation (LSC), finite elements based bivariate (BIVAR) interpolation, learning-based wavelet neural networks (WNN) methods. Among these algorithms, BIVAR was applied for the first time in this study for local geoid modeling. Apart from itsHighlights: Different interpolation algorithms can be employed in modelling the local geoid. MPR method expressed the model area with a single easy-use parametric function. LSC is a stochastic method filters noise in the data, hence gives rigorous results. WNN is a non-linear method, gives high accuracy. FEM based BIVAR algorithm is superior both in accuracy and for surface continuity. Abstract: The determination of point heights from a physical reference surface is still a challenge in geodetic and surveying applications today. Precise geoid models are used to obtain the physical point heights from the GNSS observations with height transformation. The precision of the geoid model mainly depends on the employed calculation method of the geoid as well as the accuracy, density, and distribution of the used data. This study provides a comprehensive comparison of four surface interpolation methods having different mathematical backgrounds in local geoid modeling, in the west of Turkey. In the tests, high accuracy GNSS/leveling data at the scattered control benchmarks on topography were used. The tested algorithms are multivariable polynomial regression (MPR) analysis with least-squares adjustment (LSA), stochastic based least-squares collocation (LSC), finite elements based bivariate (BIVAR) interpolation, learning-based wavelet neural networks (WNN) methods. Among these algorithms, BIVAR was applied for the first time in this study for local geoid modeling. Apart from its superiority for accuracy, this finite elements based algorithm is considerably successful than the other three methods in providing continuity of the surface model. The surface continuity is a crucial issue in local geoid modeling. In this regard, the results of this study make a significant contribution to the practical use of local geoids. The calculated local geoid models with interpolation techniques were also compared with a gravimetric geoid model in the area. In overall results, the BIVAR interpolation algorithm provided superior performance than the other tested geoid models. Hence, its use was highly recommended for local geoid modeling. The accuracy of the local geoid model calculated with the BIVAR method is 2.65 cm. … (more)
- Is Part Of:
- Measurement. Volume 173(2021)
- Journal:
- Measurement
- Issue:
- Volume 173(2021)
- Issue Display:
- Volume 173, Issue 2021 (2021)
- Year:
- 2021
- Volume:
- 173
- Issue:
- 2021
- Issue Sort Value:
- 2021-0173-2021-0000
- Page Start:
- Page End:
- Publication Date:
- 2021-03
- Subjects:
- GNSS/leveling -- Geoid -- Surface interpolation -- Height determination -- Finite elements method (FEM) -- Bivariate (BIVAR) interpolation -- Wavelet neural networks (WNN) -- Least squares collocation (LSC)
Weights and measures -- Periodicals
Measurement -- Periodicals
Measurement
Weights and measures
Periodicals
530.8 - Journal URLs:
- http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/journal/02632241 ↗
http://www.elsevier.com/journals ↗ - DOI:
- 10.1016/j.measurement.2020.108623 ↗
- Languages:
- English
- ISSNs:
- 0263-2241
- Deposit Type:
- Legaldeposit
- View Content:
- Available online (eLD content is only available in our Reading Rooms) ↗
- Physical Locations:
- British Library DSC - 5413.544700
British Library DSC - BLDSS-3PM
British Library HMNTS - ELD Digital store - Ingest File:
- 15795.xml