Comparison of single-scanner single-protocol quantitative ADC measurements to ADC ratios to detect clinically significant prostate cancer. Issue 136 (March 2021)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Wang, Xianfeng; Hielscher, Thomas; Radtke, Jan Philipp; Görtz, Magdalena; Schütz, Viktoria; Kuder, Tristan Anselm; Gnirs, Regula; Schwab, Constantin; Stenzinger, Albrecht; Hohenfellner, Markus; Schlemmer, Heinz-Peter; Bonekamp, David
• Is Part Of: European journal of radiology. Issue 136(2021)
• Publication Date: 2021-03
• Subjects: PCa prostate cancer -- mpMRI multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging -- sPC clinically significant prostate cancer -- DWI diffusion-weighted imaging -- PZ peripheral zone -- TZ transition zone -- ADC apparent diffusion coefficient -- GS Gleason score -- PI-RADS prostate imaging reporting and data system -- RPE radical prostatectomy -- MR/TRUS magnetic resonance / transrectal ultrasound -- T2WI T2-weighted imaging -- DCE dynamic contrast-enhanced -- EPI echo-planar imaging -- SPAIR spectral attenuated inversion recovery fat saturation -- PACS picture archiving and communication system -- MITK medical imaging toolkit -- ROI regions of interest -- NL normal-appearing -- BLA urinary bladder -- RIOM right internal obturator muscle -- LIOM left internal obturator muscle -- IQR inter-quartile range -- LRT likelihood-ratio test -- ROC receiver operating characteristics -- AUC area under the curve -- CI confidence interval -- WP whole-prostate -- BPH benign prostate hyperplasia; Prostate cancer -- Multiparametric MRI -- Apparent diffusion coefficient -- Gleason score; Medical radiology -- Periodicals; Radiology -- Periodicals; Radiologie médicale -- Périodiques; Medical radiology; Periodicals; 616.075705
• DOI: 10.1016/j.ejrad.2021.109538
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 0720-048X

Abstract

Highlights: For sPC detection mean ADC from single scanner and single protocol cannot be further enhanced by normalization to reference tissues. For sPC detection mean ADC from single scanner and single protocol cannot be further enhanced by normalization to reference tissues. ADCratioPZNL performed similar to mean ADC and is identified as an optimal choice when homogeneous data acquisition is not available. The stability of single scanner measurements motivates further investigation of ADC calibration methods to increase between-scanner comparability. For achieving fully quantitative MRI direct utilization of scanner-provided ADC in mm2/s is preferred over unitless ADC ratios. Abstract: Background: Mean ADC has high predictive value for the presence of clinically significant prostate cancer (sPC). Measurement variability is introduced by different scanners, protocols, intra-and inter-patient variation. Internal calibration by ADC ratios can address such fluctuations however can potentially lower the biological value of quantitative ADC determination by being sensitive to deviations in reference tissue signal. Purpose: To better understand the predictive value of quantitative ADC measurements in comparison to internal reference ratios when measured in a single scanner, single protocol setup. Materials and methods: 284 consecutive patients who underwent 3 T MRI on a single scanner followed by MRI-transrectal ultrasound fusion biopsy were included. A board-certified radiologist retrospectively reviewed all MRIs blinded to clinical information and placed regions of interest (ROI) on all focal lesions and the following reference regions: normal-appearing peripheral zone (PZNL) and transition zone (TZNL), the urinary bladder (BLA), and right and left internal obturator muscle (RIOM, LIOM). ROI-based mean ADC and ADC ratios to the reference regions were compared regarding their ability to predict the aggressiveness of prostate cancer. Spearman's rank correlation coefficient was used to estimate the correlation between ADC parameters, Gleason score (GS) and ADC ratios. The primary endpoint was presence of sPC, defined as a GS ≥ 3 + 4. Univariable and multivariable logistic regression models were constructed to predict sPC. Receiver operating characteristics curves (ROC) were used for visualization; DeLong test was used to evaluate the differences of the area under the curve (AUC). Bias-corrected AUC values and corresponding 95 %-CI were calculated using bootstrapping with 100 bootstrap samples. Results: After exclusion of patients who received prior treatment, 259 patients were included in the final cohort of which 220 harbored 351 MR lesions. Mean ADC and ADC ratios demonstrated a negative correlation with the GS. Mean ADC had the strongest correlation with ρ of -0.34, followed by ADCratioPZNL (ρ=-0.32). All ADC parameters except ADCratioLIOM (p = 0.07) were associated with sPC p<0.05). Mean ADC and ADCratioPZNL had the highest ROC AUC of all parameters (0.68). Multivariable models with mean ADC improve predictive performance. Conclusions: A highly standardized single-scanner mean ADC measurement could not be improved upon using any of the single ADC ratio parameters or combinations of these parameters in predicting the aggressiveness of prostate cancer.