Development of a New Triage Method to Prioritize Patients Arriving at the Emergency Room. Issue Volume 34:Issue s1(2019) (May 2019)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Natsukawa, Tomoaki; Deguchi, Ryo; Akita, Naoki; Uemori, Sadayori; Miki, Toyokazu; Kato, Noboru
• Is Part Of: Prehospital and disaster medicine. Volume 34:Issue s1(2019)
• Page Start: s118
• Page End: s119
• Publication Date: 2019-05
• Subjects: Emergency medical services -- Periodicals; Emergency medicine -- Periodicals; Disaster medicine -- Periodicals; 616.025
• DOI: 10.1017/S1049023X1900253X
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 1049-023X

Abstract

Abstract : Introduction: By prioritizing emergency patients, triage facilitates the timely provision of care to the largest possible number of patients arriving at an emergency room (ER). Previous triage methods include the Canadian and Japan Triage and Acuity Scales. Since these methods sort patients into five categories, multiple patients are often categorized into the same category. Furthermore, since these scales adopt original complex algorithms to determine the triage category, triage personnel need to be very familiar with the algorithm. Hence, a simple triage method is needed to prioritize ER patients. Aim: To develop a new triage method to prioritize patients arriving at the ER. Methods: Patients aged ≥13 years who arrived at the ER of Yodogawa Christian Hospital without being transported by ambulance between January 2016 and October 2018 were assessed. We analyzed correlations between the items included in the triage sheet and admission. We calculated risk ratios (RRs) of the items that were significantly related to admission. The RR of an item was considered its score, and the triage score was calculated by summing the individual RR scores for each patient. We performed receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis of admission and triage scores. Results: Among 20992 patients, 2030 patients (9.7%) were admitted to the hospital. The triage scores of all the patients ranged from 26.5 to 62.3. According to the ROC analysis, the area under the curve was 0.791 and the optimal cutoff value for the triage score was 32.7 (sensitivity: 0.74, specificity: 0.70). Discussion: Since this research was based on data from a Japanese secondary level emergency hospital in an urban area, our triage method can be adapted to the many ERs in Japan that share a similar background. The method used to develop this triage method can also be used to develop triage methods for ERs with different backgrounds.