BMI self-selection: Exploring alternatives to self-reported BMI. Issue 3 (July 2021)
- Record Type:
- Journal Article
- Title:
- BMI self-selection: Exploring alternatives to self-reported BMI. Issue 3 (July 2021)
- Main Title:
- BMI self-selection: Exploring alternatives to self-reported BMI
- Authors:
- Shiely, Frances
Millar, Seán R - Abstract:
- Background: Accurately measuring BMI in large epidemiological studies is problematic as objective measurements are expensive, so subjective methodologies must usually suffice. The purpose of this study is to explore a new subjective method of BMI measurement: BMI self-selection. Methods: A cross-sectional analysis of the Mitchelstown Cohort Rescreen study, a random sample of 1, 354 men and women aged 51–77 years recruited from a single primary care centre. BMI self-selection was measured by asking patients to select their BMI category: underweight, normal weight, overweight, obese. Weight and height were also objectively measured. Results: 79% were overweight or obese: 86% of males, 69% of females (P < 0.001) and 59% of these underestimated their BMI. The sensitivity for correct BMI self-selection for normal weight, overweight and obese was 77%, 61% and 11% respectively. In multivariable analysis, gender, higher education levels, being told by a health professional to lose weight, and being on a diet were significantly associated with correct BMI self-selection. There was a linear trend relationship between increasing BMI levels and correct selection of BMI; participants in the highest BMI quartile had an approximate eight-fold increased odds of correctly selecting their BMI when compared to participants within the lower overweight/obese quartiles (OR = 7.72, 95%CI:4.59, 12.98). Conclusions: BMI self-selection may be useful for self-reporting BMI. Clinicians need to be awareBackground: Accurately measuring BMI in large epidemiological studies is problematic as objective measurements are expensive, so subjective methodologies must usually suffice. The purpose of this study is to explore a new subjective method of BMI measurement: BMI self-selection. Methods: A cross-sectional analysis of the Mitchelstown Cohort Rescreen study, a random sample of 1, 354 men and women aged 51–77 years recruited from a single primary care centre. BMI self-selection was measured by asking patients to select their BMI category: underweight, normal weight, overweight, obese. Weight and height were also objectively measured. Results: 79% were overweight or obese: 86% of males, 69% of females (P < 0.001) and 59% of these underestimated their BMI. The sensitivity for correct BMI self-selection for normal weight, overweight and obese was 77%, 61% and 11% respectively. In multivariable analysis, gender, higher education levels, being told by a health professional to lose weight, and being on a diet were significantly associated with correct BMI self-selection. There was a linear trend relationship between increasing BMI levels and correct selection of BMI; participants in the highest BMI quartile had an approximate eight-fold increased odds of correctly selecting their BMI when compared to participants within the lower overweight/obese quartiles (OR = 7.72, 95%CI:4.59, 12.98). Conclusions: BMI self-selection may be useful for self-reporting BMI. Clinicians need to be aware of disparities between BMI self-selection at higher and lower BMI levels among overweight/obese patients and encourage preventative action for those at the lower levels to avoid weight gain and thus reduce their all-cause mortality risk. … (more)
- Is Part Of:
- Research methods in medicine & health sciences. Volume 2:Issue 3(2021)
- Journal:
- Research methods in medicine & health sciences
- Issue:
- Volume 2:Issue 3(2021)
- Issue Display:
- Volume 2, Issue 3 (2021)
- Year:
- 2021
- Volume:
- 2
- Issue:
- 3
- Issue Sort Value:
- 2021-0002-0003-0000
- Page Start:
- 112
- Page End:
- 122
- Publication Date:
- 2021-07
- Subjects:
- Body mass index -- weight status -- BMI self-selection -- misclassification
Medicine -- Research -- Periodicals
Medical sciences -- Research -- Periodicals
610.7205 - Journal URLs:
- https://journals.sagepub.com/home/rmm ↗
- DOI:
- 10.1177/26320843211010061 ↗
- Languages:
- English
- ISSNs:
- 2632-0843
- Deposit Type:
- Legaldeposit
- View Content:
- Available online (eLD content is only available in our Reading Rooms) ↗
- Physical Locations:
- British Library HMNTS - ELD Digital store
- Ingest File:
- 15772.xml