Morphometry of the kangaroo spine and its comparison with human spinal data. Issue 3 (6th October 2020)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Wilke, Hans‐Joachim; Betz, Volker Michael; Kienle, Annette
• Is Part Of: Journal of anatomy. Volume 238:Issue 3(2021)
• Page Start: 626
• Page End: 642
• Publication Date: 2020-10-06
• Subjects: animal model -- biomechanics -- kangaroo -- morphometry -- spine; Anatomy -- Periodicals; 571.3
• DOI: 10.1111/joa.13323
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 0021-8782

Abstract

Abstract: The upright posture of the kangaroo suggests that the spine of the kangaroo could be a possible substitute model for biomechanical studies of the human spine. A prerequisite for this should be the agreement of anatomy in humans and kangaroos. The purpose of this study was to investigate the anatomical parameters of the kangaroo spine from C4 to S4 and compare them with existing anatomical data of the human spine. Eight complete spines of the red giant kangaroo were obtained and 21 anatomical parameters were measured from the vertebral bodies, spinal canal, endplate, pedicles, intervertebral discs, transverse, and spinous processes. Most similarities between kangaroo and human spines were found for the vertebral bodies in the cervical and the lumbar spine. The largest differences were evident for the spinous processes. Although both species are somehow upright, these differences may be explained by the way how they move. Jumping probably requires more muscle strength than walking on two legs. Abstract : Most similarities between kangaroo and human spines were found for the vertebral bodies in the cervical and the lumbar spine. The largest differences were evident for the spinous processes. Although both species are somehow upright, these differences may be explained by the way how they move. Jumping probably requires more muscle strength than walking on two legs.