A First Step Toward the Operationalization of the Learned Non-Use Phenomenon: A Delphi Study. (May 2021)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Hirsch, Theresa; Barthel, Maria; Aarts, Pauline; Chen, Yi-An; Freivogel, Susanna; Johnson, Michelle J.; Jones, Theresa A.; Jongsma, Marijtje L. A.; Maier, Martina; Punt, David; Sterr, Annette; Wolf, Steven L.; Heise, Kirstin-Friederike
• Is Part Of: Neurorehabilitation & neural repair. Volume 35:Number 5(2021)
• Page Start: 383
• Page End: 392
• Publication Date: 2021-05
• Subjects: experience-dependent non-use -- sensorimotor learning -- rehabilitation -- perceptual disorders -- diagnosis; Nervous system -- Diseases -- Patients -- Rehabilitation -- Periodicals; Brain damage -- Patients -- Rehabilitation -- Periodicals; Spinal cord -- Wounds and injuries -- Patients -- Rehabilitation -- Periodicals; Nervous system -- Regeneration -- Periodicals; Neuroplasticity -- Periodicals; 616.804305
• DOI: 10.1177/1545968321999064
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 1545-9683

Abstract

Background: The negative discrepancy between residual functional capacity and reduced use of the contralesional hand, frequently observed after a brain lesion, has been termed Learned Non-Use (LNU) and is thought to depend on the interaction of neuronal mechanisms during recovery and learning-dependent mechanisms. Objective: Albeit the LNU phenomenon is generally accepted to exist, currently, no transdisciplinary definition exists. Furthermore, although therapeutic approaches are implemented in clinical practice targeting LNU, no standardized diagnostic routine is described in the available literature. Our objective was to reach consensus regarding a definition as well as synthesize knowledge about the current diagnostic procedures. Methods: We used a structured group communication following the Delphi method among clinical and scientific experts in the field, knowledge from both, the work with patient populations and with animal models. Results: Consensus was reached regarding a transdisciplinary definition of the LNU phenomenon. Furthermore, the mode and strategy of the diagnostic process, as well as the sources of information and outcome parameters relevant for the clinical decision making, were described with a wide range showing the current lack of a consistent universal diagnostic approach. Conclusions: The need for the development of a structured diagnostic procedure and its implementation into clinical practice is emphasized. Moreover, it exists a striking gap between the prevailing hypotheses regarding the mechanisms underlying the LNU phenomenon and the actual evidence. Therefore, basic research is needed to bridge between bedside and bench and eventually improve clinical decision making and further development of interventional strategies beyond the field of stroke rehabilitation.