Accuracy of aortic dissection detection risk score alone or with D-dimer: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Issue 3 (1st October 2020)
- Record Type:
- Journal Article
- Title:
- Accuracy of aortic dissection detection risk score alone or with D-dimer: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Issue 3 (1st October 2020)
- Main Title:
- Accuracy of aortic dissection detection risk score alone or with D-dimer: A systematic review and meta-analysis
- Authors:
- Tsutsumi, Yusuke
Tsujimoto, Yasushi
Takahashi, Sei
Tsuchiya, Asuka
Fukuma, Shingo
Yamamoto, Yosuke
Fukuhara, Shunichi - Abstract:
- Abstract : Background: To evaluate the diagnostic accuracy and clinical utility of the acute aortic dissection detection risk score (ADD-RS) alone or with D-dimer as a screening test to exclude acute aortic syndrome. Methods: We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis of studies examining the diagnostic accuracy of ADD-RS. We searched MEDLINE, Embase and Cochrane Controlled Register of Trials up to 12 December 2018. Results: We identified nine studies involving 26, 598 patients for ADD-RS alone and 3421 patients with D-dimer. Overall, the methodological quality based on the Quality Assessment of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies 2 was moderate to high. Bivariate meta-analyses showed that the pooled sensitivities were 0.94 (95% confidence interval (CI) 0.90, 0.96) at the threshold of ADD-RS ≥1, 0.46 (95% CI, 0.34, 0.59) at ADD-RS ≥2, 1.00 (95% CI 0.99, 1.00) at ADD-RS ≥1 with D-dimer and 0.99 (95% CI 0.97, 1.00) at ADD-RS ≥2 with D-dimer. For the low prevalence population, failure rate and efficiency were 0.8% and 38.3% at ADD-RS ≥1, 0.03% and 14.5% at ADD-RS ≥1 with D-dimer, and 0.1% and 33.6% at ADD-RS ≥2 with D-dimer, respectively. For the high prevalence population, failure rate and efficiency were 3.8% and 33.3% at ADD-RS ≥1, 0.2% and 12.3% at ADD-RS ≥1 with D-dimer and 0.6% and 28.4% at ADD-RS ≥2 with D-dimer, respectively. Conclusions: ADD-RS alone or with D-dimer was a useful screening test with high sensitivity to exclude acute aortic syndrome. However, the optimalAbstract : Background: To evaluate the diagnostic accuracy and clinical utility of the acute aortic dissection detection risk score (ADD-RS) alone or with D-dimer as a screening test to exclude acute aortic syndrome. Methods: We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis of studies examining the diagnostic accuracy of ADD-RS. We searched MEDLINE, Embase and Cochrane Controlled Register of Trials up to 12 December 2018. Results: We identified nine studies involving 26, 598 patients for ADD-RS alone and 3421 patients with D-dimer. Overall, the methodological quality based on the Quality Assessment of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies 2 was moderate to high. Bivariate meta-analyses showed that the pooled sensitivities were 0.94 (95% confidence interval (CI) 0.90, 0.96) at the threshold of ADD-RS ≥1, 0.46 (95% CI, 0.34, 0.59) at ADD-RS ≥2, 1.00 (95% CI 0.99, 1.00) at ADD-RS ≥1 with D-dimer and 0.99 (95% CI 0.97, 1.00) at ADD-RS ≥2 with D-dimer. For the low prevalence population, failure rate and efficiency were 0.8% and 38.3% at ADD-RS ≥1, 0.03% and 14.5% at ADD-RS ≥1 with D-dimer, and 0.1% and 33.6% at ADD-RS ≥2 with D-dimer, respectively. For the high prevalence population, failure rate and efficiency were 3.8% and 33.3% at ADD-RS ≥1, 0.2% and 12.3% at ADD-RS ≥1 with D-dimer and 0.6% and 28.4% at ADD-RS ≥2 with D-dimer, respectively. Conclusions: ADD-RS alone or with D-dimer was a useful screening test with high sensitivity to exclude acute aortic syndrome. However, the optimal threshold of ADD-RS alone or with D-dimer may depend on the clinical setting. … (more)
- Is Part Of:
- European heart journal. Volume 9:Issue 3(2020)Supplement
- Journal:
- European heart journal
- Issue:
- Volume 9:Issue 3(2020)Supplement
- Issue Display:
- Volume 9, Issue 3 (2020)
- Year:
- 2020
- Volume:
- 9
- Issue:
- 3
- Issue Sort Value:
- 2020-0009-0003-0000
- Page Start:
- S32
- Page End:
- S39
- Publication Date:
- 2020-10-01
- Subjects:
- Aortic dissection detection risk score -- D-dimer -- acute aortic syndrome -- diagnostic accuracy
616.1205 - Journal URLs:
- https://academic.oup.com/ehjacc/issue ↗
http://acc.sagepub.com/ ↗
http://www.uk.sagepub.com/home.nav ↗ - DOI:
- 10.1177/2048872620901831 ↗
- Languages:
- English
- ISSNs:
- 2048-8726
- Deposit Type:
- Legaldeposit
- View Content:
- Available online (eLD content is only available in our Reading Rooms) ↗
- Physical Locations:
- British Library DSC - BLDSS-3PM
British Library HMNTS - ELD Digital store - Ingest File:
- 15782.xml