Machine-learning-based compressor models: A case study for variable refrigerant flow systems. (March 2021)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Wan, Hanlong; Cao, Tao; Hwang, Yunho; Chang, Se-Dong; Yoon, Young-Jin
• Is Part Of: International journal of refrigeration. Volume 123(2021)
• Page Start: 23
• Page End: 33
• Publication Date: 2021-03
• Subjects: Variable refrigerant flow system -- Field test -- Convolutional neural network -- Machine learning -- Compressor model; Système à débit de frigorigène variable -- Essai sur le terrain -- Réseau neuronal convolutif -- Apprentissage automatique -- Modèle de compresseur; Refrigeration and refrigerating machinery -- Periodicals; 621.56
• DOI: 10.1016/j.ijrefrig.2020.12.003
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 0140-7007

Abstract

Highlights: Propose a new approach to conduct field tests and modeling works together. Compare three physics-based approaches and three machine-learning-based methods. Compare steady-state and transient simulations using the six different approaches. Analyze the delay problem in the transient simulation using deep learning methods. Abstract: Conventionally, researchers conducted field tests and modeling works for the Variable Refrigerant Flow system separately. In this study, we used the compressor model as a case study to illustrate a novel approach to integrate field tests and modeling works. Field tests in an office building were conducted to collect data. For mass flow rate prediction, three traditional models, including the 20-coefficient model, the efficiency-based model, and the efficiency-based 20-coefficient model, and three machine-learning-based models including Support Vector Regression, Neural Network, and Random Forest, were investigated and compared. We found that the efficiency-based 20-coefficient model and the Support Vector Regression model had a higher accuracy (the mean relative errors were 0.11% and 0.15%, and the coefficient of variation of the root mean-square-error were 0.20 and 0.23) and lower uncertainty within 0.2 gs −1 for steady-state operation prediction. However, all six models failed to predict accurately the beginning part of the transient process. A tens-of-seconds delay existed between the predicted values and the experiment values. We applied the Convolutional-Neural-Network-based model to address this problem. The mean relative error of this model is reduced to 2% for dynamic simulation. In summary, we recommend the efficiency-based 20-coefficient model, and the Support Vector Regression model for the steady-state compressor model development, while the Convolutional-Neural-Network-based model is recommended for transient model development. For the power consumption prediction, 20-coefficient and Neural Network models can predict transient data well. The process of predicting the capacity is the same as the process of mass flow rate prediction.