How do cognitive processes influence script concordance test responses?. Issue 3 (29th November 2020)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Gawad, Nada; Wood, Timothy J.; Cowley, Lindsay; Raiche, Isabelle
• Is Part Of: Medical education. Volume 55:Issue 3(2021)
• Page Start: 354
• Page End: 364
• Publication Date: 2020-11-29
• Subjects: Medical education -- Periodicals; Medical education -- Great Britain -- Periodicals; 610.7
• DOI: 10.1111/medu.14416
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 0308-0110

Abstract

Abstract: Introduction: The script concordance test (SCT) is a test of clinical decision‐making (CDM) that compares the thought process of learners to that of experts to determine to what extent their cognitive 'scripts' align. Without understanding test‐takers' cognitive process, however, it is unclear what influences their responses. The objective of this study was to gather response process validity evidence by studying the cognitive process of test‐takers to determine whether the SCT tests CDM and what cognitive processes may influence SCT responses. Methods: Cases from an SCT used in a national validation study were administered and semi‐structured cognitive interviews were conducted with ten residents and five staff surgeons. A retrospective verbal probing technique was used. Data was independently analysed and coded by two analysts. Themes were identified as factors that influence SCT responses during the cognitive interview. Results: Cognitive interviews demonstrated variability in CDM among test‐takers. Consistent with dual process theory, test‐takers relied on scripts formed through past experiences, when available, to make decisions and used conscious deliberation in the absence of experience. However, test‐takers' response process was also influenced by their comprehension of specific terms, desire for additional information, disagreement with the planned management, underlying knowledge gaps and desire to demonstrate confidence or humility. Conclusion: The rationale behind SCT answers may be influenced by comprehension, underlying knowledge and social desirability in addition to formed scripts and/or conscious deliberation. Having test‐takers verbalise their rationale for responses provides a depth of assessment that is otherwise lost in the SCT's current format. With the improved ability to standardise CDM assessment using the SCT, consideration of test‐makers improving the SCT construction process and combining the SCT question format with verbal responses may improve the use of the SCT for CDM assessment. Abstract : Rather than simply being a reflection of clinical understanding, Gawad et al. reveal that Script Concordance Test responses are influenced by social desirability (i.e., a desire to demonstrate confidence or humility).