Qualitative evaluation of an innovative midwifery continuity scheme: Lessons from using a quality care framework. Issue 4 (1st December 2020)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Symon, Andrew; Shinwell, Shona
• Is Part Of: Birth. Volume 47:Issue 4(2020)
• Page Start: 378
• Page End: 388
• Publication Date: 2020-12-01
• Subjects: communication -- continuity of caregiver -- midwifery -- quality care -- relationships; Childbirth -- Periodicals; Obstetrics -- Periodicals; Newborn infants -- Care -- Periodicals; Natural childbirth -- Periodicals; 618.1
• DOI: 10.1111/birt.12512
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 0730-7659

Abstract

Abstract: Introduction: Innovative midwifery schemes must be robustly evaluated to establish whether they should be modified or can be replicated. Assessing quality of care can help to ascertain a scheme's acceptability and effectiveness. We used an established quality care framework as a benchmark in our qualitative evaluation of a combined continuity of caregiver and planned home birth scheme in Scotland. Methods: Qualitative evaluation of stakeholder perceptions using the Quality Maternal and Newborn Care Framework was the basis for six focus groups and two one‐to‐one interviews with stakeholders (new mothers, partners, midwives). A thematic analytical approach was used. Results: The qualitative evaluation found universal approval among participants. Flexible working patterns helped to nurture positive relationships, and information and support were highly valued. The principal themes—Organization of Care/Work Culture; Information and Support; Relationships—were strongly inter‐related. They shared several subthemes, notably continuity of caregiver, flexible family‐centered care, and the benefits of being at home. Flexibility and mutual respect helped women to express autonomy and develop agency. Women related their birth experiences to friends, family, and colleagues, thereby helping to normalize home birth. Conclusions: This qualitative evaluation of an innovative scheme used an established quality framework as a benchmark against which to assess stakeholder experiences. This approach helped to identify the critical codependence of factors involved in care delivery, which in turn helps to identify lessons for others considering similar schemes. Although our evaluation relates to one specific scheme, identifying the scheme's critical quality care aspects may assist others when planning similar schemes.