A nationwide database study on colectomy and colorectal cancer in ulcerative colitis: what is the role of appendectomy?. (28th July 2020)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Stellingwerf, M. E.; Bemelman, W.A.; Löwenberg, M.; Ponsioen, C. Y.; D'Haens, G. R.; van Dieren, S.; Buskens, C. J.
• Is Part Of: Colorectal disease. Volume 23:Number 1(2021)
• Page Start: 64
• Page End: 73
• Publication Date: 2020-07-28
• Subjects: Appendectomy -- colectomy -- colorectal cancer -- ulcerative colitis; Colon (Anatomy) -- Diseases -- Periodicals; Rectum -- Diseases -- Periodicals; 616.34
• DOI: 10.1111/codi.15184
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 1462-8910

Abstract

Abstract: Aim: Although has been suggested that an appendectomy has a positive effect on the disease course in patients with ulcerative colitis (UC), recent studies indicate a potential increase in risk of colectomy and colorectal cancer (CRC). This study aimed to evaluate the rates of colectomy and CRC after appendectomy in UC patients using a nationwide prospective database [the Initiative on Crohn and Colitis Parelsnoer Institute – Inflammatory Bowel Disease (ICC PSI‐IBD) database]. Method: All UC patients were retrieved from the ICC PSI‐IBD database between January 2007 and May 2018. Primary outcomes were colectomy and CRC. Outcomes were compared in patients with and without appendectomy, with a separate analysis for timing of appendectomy (before or after UC diagnosis). Results: A total of 826 UC patients (54.7% female; median age 46 years, range 18–89 years) were included. Sixty‐three (7.6%) patients had previously undergone appendectomy: 24 (38.1%) before and 33 (52.4%) after their diagnosis of UC. In multivariate analysis, appendectomy after UC diagnosis was associated with a significantly lower colectomy rate compared with no appendectomy [hazard ratio (HR) 0.16, 95% C: 0.04–0.66, P = 0.011], and the same nonsignificant trend was seen in patients with an appendectomy before UC diagnosis (HR 0.35, 95% CI 0.08–1.41, P = 0.138). Appendectomy was associated with delayed colectomy, particularly when it was performed after diagnosis of UC ( P = 0.009). No significant differences were found in the CRC rate between patients with and without appendectomy (1.6% vs 1.2%; P = 0.555). Conclusion: Appendectomy in established UC is associated with an 84% decreased risk of colectomy and a delay in surgery. Since the colon is in situ for longer, the risk of developing CRC remains, which underscores the importance of endoscopic surveillance programmes.