Country-based Comparison of Atrial Fibrillation Patients' Preferences for Oral Anticoagulation: An Evaluation of Discrete Choice Experiments in Five Different Countries. Issue 1 (January 2021)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Henry, Maren; Wosnitza, Melanie; Thate-Waschke, Inga-Marion; Bauersachs, Rupert; Ueng, Kwo-Chang; Chang, Kuan-Cheng; Wilke, Thomas
• Is Part Of: Journal of cardiovascular pharmacology. Volume 77:Issue 1(2021)
• Publication Date: 2021-01
• Subjects: atrial fibrillation -- discrete choice experiment; Cardiovascular Diseases -- drug therapy -- Periodicals; Cardiovascular System -- drug effects -- Periodicals; Cardiovascular pharmacology -- Periodicals; Cardiovascular agents -- Periodicals; Cardiovascular agents; Cardiovascular pharmacology; Periodicals; 615.7105
• DOI: 10.1097/FJC.0000000000000936
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 0160-2446

Abstract

Abstract : Abstract: The aim of this study was to examine atrial fibrillation (AF) patients' preferences regarding oral anticoagulation (OAC) characteristics and to investigate differences across 5 different countries. A multicenter discrete choice experiment was conducted in Germany, Sweden, Switzerland, Spain, and Taiwan. Study sites enrolled patients with nonvalvular AF who received continuous OAC therapy. The discrete choice experiment design considered the following 4 attributes with 2 attribute levels each: need for bridging (yes/no), interactions with food/alcohol (yes/no), need for regular international normalized ratio (INR) assessments, and frequency of intake (once/twice daily). Generally, patients (n = 1391) preferred treatment alternatives that were characterized by "no need of bridging, " "no need for regular INR controls, " "no interactions with food/alcohol, " and "once daily intake." For this desired treatment regimen, patients were willing to accept a substantially higher travel distance/time. German patients with AF were strongly impacted in their hypothetical treatment decision by the frequency of intake (37.5%). Swedish patients on the other hand gave little importance to intake frequency (12.6%). In Switzerland, patients were especially concerned with food/alcohol interactions of the medication (34.7%), whereas this was the least important attribute for Taiwanese patients (18.9%), who ascribed the most homogenous importance to the different treatment attributes overall. In Spain, the need for regular INR assessments especially impacted the patient's treatment decision (31.9%). Patients of all countries attributed a moderate importance to the need for bridging (25.9%–34.2%). These findings may facilitate country-specific consideration of patients' preferences regarding OAC therapy, potentially increasing treatment acceptance on the patient's side with the ultimate goal of improving treatment adherence and persistence. Abstract : Supplemental Digital Content is Available in the Text.