Reliability of External Characteristics to Age Barrow's Goldeneye. (18th September 2020)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Lewis, Tyler L.; Esler, Daniel; Hogan, Danica H.; Boyd, W. Sean; Bowman, Timothy D.; Thompson, Jonathan
• Is Part Of: Wildlife Society bulletin. Volume 44:Number 4(2020)
• Page Start: 654
• Page End: 661
• Publication Date: 2020-09-18
• Subjects: age class -- age ratio -- Barrow's goldeneye -- Bucephala islandica -- bursa -- plumage -- sea duck -- sex determination; Wildlife management -- Periodicals; Wildlife conservation -- Periodicals; 333.9540973
• DOI: 10.1002/wsb.1123
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 0091-7648

Abstract

ABSTRACT: Accurate assignment of age class is critical for understanding most demographic processes. For waterfowl, most techniques for determining age class require birds in hand, reducing utility for quickly and efficiently sampling a large portion of the population. As an alternative, we sought to establish an observation‐based methodology, achievable in the field with standard optics, for determining age class of Barrow's goldeneyes ( Bucephala islandica ). We photographed heads, wings, and bellies of 232 Barrow's goldeneyes captured during late winter (February–April) of 2007–2015 along the north Pacific Coast. From these photographs, we focused on 5 external characteristics for both males and females, with binary states that putatively corresponded to 2 age classes—first‐year birds (<1 yr) and adults (>1 yr). For males, all 5 external traits (belly color, head color, eye color, facial crescent, median secondary coverts color) had binary states that were reliably distinguishable by observers. Moreover, all 5 external traits were highly predictive of age class (≥96% concordance between external vs. bursal‐derived ages), and novice observers, after receiving training, were able to accurately age 96% of first‐year and 99% of adult males. In contrast, patterns were weaker for females; putative external characteristics of female age class (belly color, bill radiance, bill blackness, eye color, median secondary coverts color) had 77–91% concordance with bursal‐derived age, compared with 96–100% for males, and observers misidentified age classes of 15% of females, compared with only 2% of males. Overall, age classes of male Barrow's goldeneyes were accurately and reliably distinguishable during winter based on several external characteristics, whereas those of females were not. Our technique may be used to estimate age composition of male Barrow's goldeneyes during winter, providing a useful metric for monitoring annual changes in adult‐to‐juvenile ratios and other important demographic parameters. © 2020 The Wildlife Society. Abstract : Most techniques for assigning age class of waterfowl require birds in the hand to identify detailed or concealed traits, largely limiting their utility to species that are commonly captured or harvested. We developed guidelines to accurately estimate age class of wintering Barrow's goldeneyes via observational surveys, finding that ages of male goldeneyes were reliably distinguishable based on several external characteristics whereas ages of females were not.