Enhancing 'meaningfulness' of functional assessments: UK adaptation of the Amsterdam IADL questionnaire. (15th January 2021)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Stringer, Gemma; Leroi, Iracema; Sikkes, Sietske A. M.; Montaldi, Daniela; Brown, Laura J. E.
• Is Part Of: International psychogeriatrics. Volume 33:Number 1(2021)
• Page Start: 39
• Page End: 50
• Publication Date: 2021-01-15
• Subjects: Instrumental activities of daily living (IADL), -- mild cognitive impairment (MCI), -- subjective cognitive decline (SCD), -- cross-cultural adaptation, -- Amsterdam IADL Questionnaire (A-IADL-Q); Geriatric psychiatry -- Periodicals; 618.9768905
• DOI: 10.1017/S1041610219001881
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 1041-6102

Abstract

ABSTRACT: Objective: Commonly used measures of instrumental activities of daily living (IADL) do not capture activities for a technologically advancing society. This study aimed to adapt the proxy/informant-based Amsterdam IADL Questionnaire (A-IADL-Q) for use in the UK and develop a self-report version. Design: An iterative mixed method cross-cultural adaptation of the A-IADL-Q and the development of a self-report version involving a three-step design: (1) interviews and focus groups with lay and professional stakeholders to assess face and content validity; (2) a questionnaire to measure item relevance to older adults in the U.K.; (3) a pilot of the adapted questionnaire in people with cognitive impairment. Setting: Community settings in the UK. Participants: One hundred and forty-eight participants took part across the three steps: (1) 14 dementia professionals; 8 people with subjective cognitive decline (SCD), mild cognitive impairment (MCI), or dementia due to Alzheimer's disease; and 6 relatives of people with MCI or dementia; (2) 92 older adults without cognitive impairment; and (3) 28 people with SCD or MCI. Measurements: The cultural relevance and applicability of the A-IADL-Q scale items were assessed using a 6-point Likert scale. Cognitive and functional performance was measured using a battery of cognitive and functional measures. Results: Iterative modifications to the scale resulted in a 55-item adapted version appropriate for UK use (A-IADL-Q-UK). Pilot data revealed that the new and revised items performed well. Four new items correlated with the weighted average score (Kendall's Tau −.388, −.445, −.497, −.569). An exploratory analysis of convergent validity found correlations in the expected direction with cognitive and functional measures. Conclusion: The A-IADL-Q-UK provides a measurement of functional decline for use in the UK that captures culturally relevant activities. A new self-report version has been developed and is ready for testing. Further evaluation of the A-IADL-Q-UK for construct validity is now needed.