Differences in Performance Characteristics Among Four High-Throughput Assays for the Detection of Antibodies Against SARS-CoV-2 Using a Common Set of Patient Samples. Issue 2 (9th October 2020)
- Record Type:
- Journal Article
- Title:
- Differences in Performance Characteristics Among Four High-Throughput Assays for the Detection of Antibodies Against SARS-CoV-2 Using a Common Set of Patient Samples. Issue 2 (9th October 2020)
- Main Title:
- Differences in Performance Characteristics Among Four High-Throughput Assays for the Detection of Antibodies Against SARS-CoV-2 Using a Common Set of Patient Samples
- Authors:
- Manthei, David M
Whalen, Jason F
Schroeder, Lee F
Sinay, Anthony M
Li, Shih-Hon
Valdez, Riccardo
Giacherio, Donald A
Gherasim, Carmen - Abstract:
- Abstract: Objectives: Serologic testing for severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) has experienced a changing landscape of available assays coupled with uncertainty surrounding performance characteristics. Studies are needed to directly compare multiple commercially available assays. Methods: Residual serum samples were identified based on SARS-CoV-2 reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) testing, clinical test results, and collection dates. Serum samples were analyzed using assays from four different manufacturers: DiaSorin anti–SARS-CoV-2 S1/S2 IgG, EUROIMMUN anti–SARS-CoV-2 IgG ELISA, Roche Elecsys anti–SARS-CoV-2, and Siemens SARS-CoV-2 Total antibody assays. Results: Samples from SARS-CoV-2 RT-PCR–positive patients became increasingly positive as time from symptom onset increased. For patients with latest sample 14 or more days after symptom onset, sensitivities reached 93.1% to 96.6%, 98.3%, and 96.6% for EUROIMMUN, Roche, and Siemens assays, respectively, which were superior to the DiaSorin assay at 87.7%. The specificity of Roche and Siemens assays was 100% and superior to DiaSorin and EUROIMMUN assays, which ranged from 96.1% to 97.0% and 86.3% to 96.4%, respectively. Conclusions: Laboratories should be aware of the advantages and limitations of serology testing options for SARS-CoV-2. The specificity and sensitivity achieved by the Roche and Siemens assays would be acceptable for testing in lower-prevalence regions and haveAbstract: Objectives: Serologic testing for severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) has experienced a changing landscape of available assays coupled with uncertainty surrounding performance characteristics. Studies are needed to directly compare multiple commercially available assays. Methods: Residual serum samples were identified based on SARS-CoV-2 reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) testing, clinical test results, and collection dates. Serum samples were analyzed using assays from four different manufacturers: DiaSorin anti–SARS-CoV-2 S1/S2 IgG, EUROIMMUN anti–SARS-CoV-2 IgG ELISA, Roche Elecsys anti–SARS-CoV-2, and Siemens SARS-CoV-2 Total antibody assays. Results: Samples from SARS-CoV-2 RT-PCR–positive patients became increasingly positive as time from symptom onset increased. For patients with latest sample 14 or more days after symptom onset, sensitivities reached 93.1% to 96.6%, 98.3%, and 96.6% for EUROIMMUN, Roche, and Siemens assays, respectively, which were superior to the DiaSorin assay at 87.7%. The specificity of Roche and Siemens assays was 100% and superior to DiaSorin and EUROIMMUN assays, which ranged from 96.1% to 97.0% and 86.3% to 96.4%, respectively. Conclusions: Laboratories should be aware of the advantages and limitations of serology testing options for SARS-CoV-2. The specificity and sensitivity achieved by the Roche and Siemens assays would be acceptable for testing in lower-prevalence regions and have the potential of orthogonal testing advantages if used in combination. … (more)
- Is Part Of:
- American journal of clinical pathology. Volume 155:Issue 2(2021)
- Journal:
- American journal of clinical pathology
- Issue:
- Volume 155:Issue 2(2021)
- Issue Display:
- Volume 155, Issue 2 (2021)
- Year:
- 2021
- Volume:
- 155
- Issue:
- 2
- Issue Sort Value:
- 2021-0155-0002-0000
- Page Start:
- 267
- Page End:
- 279
- Publication Date:
- 2020-10-09
- Subjects:
- SARS-CoV-2 -- Serology -- Immunoassay -- Specificity -- Sensitivity -- COVID-19 -- Coronavirus
Diagnosis, Laboratory -- Periodicals
Pathology -- Periodicals
616.07 - Journal URLs:
- http://www.oxfordjournals.org/ ↗
http://ajcp.oxfordjournals.org/ ↗ - DOI:
- 10.1093/ajcp/aqaa200 ↗
- Languages:
- English
- ISSNs:
- 0002-9173
- Deposit Type:
- Legaldeposit
- View Content:
- Available online (eLD content is only available in our Reading Rooms) ↗
- Physical Locations:
- British Library DSC - 0824.000000
British Library DSC - BLDSS-3PM
British Library HMNTS - ELD Digital store - Ingest File:
- 15746.xml