Evaluation of the Response Analysis Approach Used in the Mechanistic-Empirical Pavement Design Guide. Issue 4 (April 2021)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Fu, Guozhi; Zhao, Yanqing; Liu, Wanqiu; Zhou, Changjun
• Is Part Of: Transportation research record. Volume 2675:Issue 4(2021)
• Page Start: 171
• Page End: 180
• Publication Date: 2021-04
• Subjects: Transportation -- Periodicals; Roads; Transport -- Périodiques; Routes -- Périodiques; Routes -- Conception et construction -- Périodiques; Roads; Transportation; 388.05
• DOI: 10.1177/0361198120974010
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 0361-1981

Abstract

Asphalt concrete (AC) is a typical viscoelastic material exhibiting rate-dependent behavior. The rate-dependency of AC should be properly taken into consideration in pavement response analysis to accurately evaluate pavement performance and life. In the Mechanistic-Empirical Pavement Design Guide (MEPDG), the dynamic modulus master curve is used to account for the rate-dependency of the dynamic modulus of AC. However, the rate-dependent phase angle is ignored and a constant phase angle of 0 is assumed. The partial characterization of rate-dependent properties of AC in the MEPDG may lead to inaccurate results. This study compares the pavement responses computed using the MEPDG approach and the layered viscoelastic theory (LVET) which utilizes the complex modulus master curve to fully characterize the rate-dependent properties of AC. Typical three-layer pavement structures were analyzed at three temperatures (−10°C, 20°C and 50°C) and four speeds (10, 40, 80 and 120 km/h). The results show that the horizontal tensile stresses at the bottom of cement-treated base layer obtained from the two approaches are almost the same, and for other responses analyzed, the results obtained from the MEPDG approach are larger than those from the LVET approach, especially for the responses in the AC layer. The normalized difference of the vertical compressive strain at the mid-depth of the AC layer between the two approaches can be up to 100% and that for the horizontal tensile strain at the bottom of the AC layer can be more than 50%.