Vasopressin antagonism in heart failure: a review of the hemodynamic studies and major clinical trials. (January 2021)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Urbach, Jonathan; Goldsmith, Steven R.
• Is Part Of: Therapeutic advances in cardiovascular disease. Volume 15(2021)
• Publication Date: 2021-01
• Subjects: heart failure -- arginine vasopressin -- neurohormonal imbalance; Cardiovascular system -- Diseases -- Periodicals; Cardiovascular system -- Diseases -- Treatment -- Periodicals; Cardiovascular pharmacology -- Periodicals; Cardiovascular Diseases -- diagnosis -- Periodicals; Cardiovascular Diseases -- therapy -- Periodicals; Cardiovascular Agents -- therapeutic use -- Periodicals; Cardiovascular Diseases -- drug therapy -- Periodicals; Cardiovascular System -- drug effects -- Periodicals; Cardiologie; Hart- en vaatziekten; Appareil cardiovasculaire -- Maladies -- Périodiques; Appareil cardiovasculaire -- Maladies -- Traitement -- Périodiques; Pharmacologie cardiovasculaire -- Périodiques; 616.10605
• DOI: 10.1177/1753944720977741
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 1753-9447

Abstract

For decades, plasma arginine vasopressin (AVP) levels have been known to be elevated in patients with congestive heart failure (HF). Excessive AVP signaling at either or both the V1a and V2 receptors could contribute to the pathophysiology of HF by several mechanisms. V1a activation could cause vasoconstriction and/or direct myocardial hypertrophy as intracellular signaling pathways are closely related to those for angiotensin II. V2 activation could cause fluid retention and hyponatremia. A hemodynamic study with the pure V2 antagonist tolvaptan (TV) showed minimal hemodynamic effects. Compared with furosemide in another study, the renal and neurohormonal effects of TV were favorable. Several clinical trials with TV as adjunctive therapy in acute HF have shown beneficial effects on fluid balance and dyspnea, with no worsening of renal function or neurohormonal stimulation. Two smaller studies, one in acute and one in chronic HF, have shown comparable clinical and more favorable renal and neurohormonal effects of TV compared with loop diuretics. However, long-term treatment with TV did not alter outcomes in acute HF. No data are available other than single-dose studies of an intravenous pure V1a antagonist, which showed a vasodilating effect if plasma AVP levels were elevated. One hemodynamic study and one short-duration clinical trial with the balanced intravenous V1a/V2 antagonist conivaptan (CV) showed hemodynamic and clinical effects largely similar to those with TV in similar studies. A new orally effective balanced V1/V2 antagonist (pecavaptan) is currently undergoing phase II study as both adjunctive and alternative therapy during and after hospitalization for acute HF. The purpose of this review is to summarize what we have learned from the clinical experience with TV and CV, and to suggest implications of these findings for future work with newer agents.