Using word embeddings to improve the privacy of clinical notes. (10th May 2020)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Abdalla, Mohamed; Abdalla, Moustafa; Rudzicz, Frank; Hirst, Graeme
• Is Part Of: Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association. Volume 27:Number 6(2020)
• Page Start: 901
• Page End: 907
• Publication Date: 2020-05-10
• Subjects: : privacy -- data anonymization -- natural language processing -- personal health records; Medical informatics -- Periodicals; Information Services -- Periodicals; Medical Informatics -- Periodicals; Médecine -- Informatique -- Périodiques; Informatica; Geneeskunde; Informatique médicale; Computer network resources; Electronic journals; 610.285
• DOI: 10.1093/jamia/ocaa038
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 1067-5027

Abstract

Abstract: Objective: In this work, we introduce a privacy technique for anonymizing clinical notes that guarantees all private health information is secured (including sensitive data, such as family history, that are not adequately covered by current techniques). Materials and Methods: We employ a new "random replacement" paradigm (replacing each token in clinical notes with neighboring word vectors from the embedding space) to achieve 100% recall on the removal of sensitive information, unachievable with current "search-and-secure" paradigms. We demonstrate the utility of this paradigm on multiple corpora in a diverse set of classification tasks. Results: We empirically evaluate the effect of our anonymization technique both on upstream and downstream natural language processing tasks to show that our perturbations, while increasing security (ie, achieving 100% recall on any dataset), do not greatly impact the results of end-to-end machine learning approaches. Discussion: As long as current approaches utilize precision and recall to evaluate deidentification algorithms, there will remain a risk of overlooking sensitive information. Inspired by differential privacy, we sought to make it statistically infeasible to recreate the original data, although at the cost of readability. We hope that the work will serve as a catalyst to further research into alternative deidentification methods that can address current weaknesses. Conclusion: Our proposed technique can secure clinical texts at a low cost and extremely high recall with a readability trade-off while remaining useful for natural language processing classification tasks. We hope that our work can be used by risk-averse data holders to release clinical texts to researchers.