An exploratory study using an openEHR 2-level modeling approach to represent common data elements. (23rd January 2016)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Lin, Ching-Heng; Fann, Yang-Cheng; Liou, Der-Ming
• Is Part Of: Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association. Volume 23:Number 5(2016:Sep.)
• Page Start: 956
• Page End: 967
• Publication Date: 2016-01-23
• Subjects: common data element -- openEHR archetype -- modeling approach; Medical informatics -- Periodicals; Information Services -- Periodicals; Medical Informatics -- Periodicals; Médecine -- Informatique -- Périodiques; Informatica; Geneeskunde; Informatique médicale; Computer network resources; Electronic journals; 610.285
• DOI: 10.1093/jamia/ocv137
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 1067-5027

Abstract

Abstract : Background and Objective In order to facilitate clinical research across multiple institutions, data harmonization is a critical requirement. Common data elements (CDEs) collect data uniformly, allowing data interoperability between research studies. However, structural limitations have hindered the application of CDEs. An advanced modeling structure is needed to rectify such limitations. The openEHR 2-level modeling approach has been widely implemented in the medical informatics domain. The aim of our study is to explore the feasibility of applying an openEHR approach to model the CDE concept. Materials and Methods Using the National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke General CDEs as material, we developed a semiautomatic mapping tool to assist domain experts mapping CDEs to existing openEHR archetypes in order to evaluate their coverage and to allow further analysis. In addition, we modeled a set of CDEs using the openEHR approach to evaluate the ability of archetypes to structurally represent any type of CDE content. Results Among 184 CDEs, 28% (51) of the archetypes could be directly used to represent CDEs, while 53% (98) of the archetypes required further development (extension or specialization). A comprehensive comparison between CDEs and openEHR archetypes was conducted based on the lessons learnt from the practical modeling. Discussion CDEs and archetypes have dissimilar modeling approaches, but the data structure of both models are essentially similar. This study proposes to develop a comprehensive structure to model CDE concepts instead of improving the structure of CED. Conclusion The findings from this research show that the openEHR archetype has structural coverage for the CDEs, namely the openEHR archetype is able to represent the CDEs and meet the functional expectations of the CDEs. This work can be used as a reference when improving CDE structure using an advanced modeling approach.