VDC_100102371237.0X000001. Issue 10 (October 2018)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Alizadeh, Reza Fazl; Chaudhry, Haris H.; Li, Shiri; Jafari, Mehraneh D.; Mills, Steven D.; Carmichael, Joseph C.; Pigazzi, Alessio; Monson, John R.T.; Stamos, Michael J.
• Is Part Of: American surgeon. Volume 84:Issue 10(2018)
• Page Start: 1639
• Page End: 1644
• Publication Date: 2018-10
• Subjects: Surgery -- Periodicals; Surgery -- United States -- Periodicals; 617.0973
• DOI: 10.1177/000313481808401021
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 0003-1348

Abstract

Ileocolic resection is the most common operation performed for Crohn's disease patients with terminal ileum involvement. We sought to evaluate the outcomes in Crohn's disease patients who underwent open ileocolic resection (OIC) and laparoscopic ileocolic resection (LIC) by using the ACS-NSQIP database from 2006 to 2015. Of 5670 patients, 48.3 per cent (2737) patients had OIC and 51.7 per cent (2933) had LIC. The number of LIC increased from 40 per cent in 2006 to 60.7 per cent in 2015. Moreover, the annual number of LIC surgeries has exceeded the number of OIC surgeries since 2013. Patients in the LIC group had shorter hospital length of stay compared with OIC group (6 ± 5 days vs 8.6 ± 8 days, P < 0.01). The LIC procedure also had shorter operation time compared with OIC (148 ± 58 vs 153 ± 76 minutes, P = 0.01). Overall morbidity (15.8% vs 25.3%, AOR: 0.54, confidence interval (CI): 0.46–0.62, P < 0.01), serious morbidity (10.9% vs 18%, AOR: 0.55, CI: 0.46–0.65, P < 0.01), and SSI (9.9% vs 15.5%, AOR: 0.59, CI: 0.49–0.70, P < 0.01) rates were lower in the LIC group than the OIC group. We demonstrated that in Crohn's disease patients, LIC has improved outcomes for ileocolic resection compared with OIC and has been chosen as the preferential treatment approach for most patients.