The Stroop Negative Priming Matching Task: A New Task for the Direct Comparison of Interference Control and Inhibition. (June 2021)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Sammer, Gebhard; Lockhofen, Denise; Lenz, Eva
• Is Part Of: Assessment. Volume 28:Number 4(2021)
• Page Start: 1232
• Page End: 1244
• Publication Date: 2021-06
• Subjects: Stroop task -- negative priming -- interference -- inhibition -- interstimulus interval; Psychological tests -- Periodicals; Psychodiagnostics -- Periodicals; Personality tests -- Periodicals; 150.287
• DOI: 10.1177/1073191119900254
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 1073-1911

Abstract

Inhibition processing is an inherent part of cognitive and behavioral control. The aim of the present study was to develop and investigate psychometric criteria of an experimental paradigm that combines Stroop interference and negative priming, both of which involve inhibitory processes. We adopted a Stroop matching paradigm assessing interference control and implemented a negative priming condition. A nonclinical community sample of 94 volunteers performed this Stroop Negative Priming Matching paradigm. Since timing plays a role in priming, the interval between the prime and the probe has been varied in length (500 ms, 800 ms, and 3000 ms). The main results showed both, effects of Stroop interference and negative priming, as indicated by reaction times and incorrect responses. Reduced time pressure showed an effect on response speed and accuracy, but no interaction with interference and priming effects occurred. Reliability computed as internal consistency was generally high and did not differ between Stroop interference and negative priming scales. Retest-reliability was best for the prime–probe interval of 3000 ms. Concluding, the Stroop negative priming matching task provides reliable and directly comparable assessment of Stroop interference and negative priming effects.