Nutritional adequacy in critically ill patients: Result of PNSI study. Issue 2 (February 2021)
- Record Type:
- Journal Article
- Title:
- Nutritional adequacy in critically ill patients: Result of PNSI study. Issue 2 (February 2021)
- Main Title:
- Nutritional adequacy in critically ill patients: Result of PNSI study
- Authors:
- Javid, Zeinab
Shadnoush, Mahdi
Khadem-Rezaiyan, Majid
Mohammad Zadeh Honarvar, Niyaz
Sedaghat, Alireza
Hashemian, Seyed Mohammadreza
Ardehali, Seyed Hossein
Nematy, Mohsen
Pournik, Omid
Beigmohammadi, Mohammad Taghi
Safarian, Mohammad
Moradi Moghaddam, Omid
Khoshfetrat, Masoum
Zand, Farid
Mohammad Alizadeh, Afshin
Kosari Monfared, Mahboube
Mazaheri Eftekhar, Fatemeh
Mohamadi Narab, Maryam
Taheri, Arefe Sadat
Babakhani, Khatereh
Foroutan, Behnam
Jamialahmadi, Tannaz
Jabbarzadeh Gangeh, Bahareh
Meshkani, Mehrnoush
Kimiaee, Fahime
Norouzy, Abdolreza - Abstract:
- Summary: Background & aims: Critically ill patients are provided with the intensive care medicine to prevent further complications, including malnutrition, disease progression, and even death. This study was intended to assess nutritional support and its' efficacy in the Intensive Care Units (ICUs) of Iran. Methods: This cross-sectional study assessed 50 ICU's patients out of 25 hospitals in the 10 major regions of Iran's health system and was performed using the multistage cluster sampling design. The data were collected from patient's medical records, ICU nursing sheets, patients or their relatives from 2017 to 2018. Nutritional status was investigated by modified NUTRIC score and food frequency checklist. Results: This study included 1321 ICU patients with the mean age of 54.8 ± 19.97 years, mean mNUTRIC score of 3.4 ± 2.14, and malnutrition rate of 32.6%. The mean time of first feeding was the second day and most of patients (66%) received nutrition support, mainly through enteral (57.2%) or oral (37%) route during ICU stay. The patients received 59.2 ± 37.78 percent of required calorie and 55.5 ± 30.04 percent of required protein. Adequate intake of energy and protein was provided for 16.2% and 10.7% of the patients, respectively. The result of regression analysis showed that the odds ratio of mNUTRIC score was 0.85 (95% confidence interval [CI] = 0.74–0.98) and APACHE II was 0.92 (95%CI = 0.89–0.95) for the prediction of energy deficiency. Nutrition intake wasSummary: Background & aims: Critically ill patients are provided with the intensive care medicine to prevent further complications, including malnutrition, disease progression, and even death. This study was intended to assess nutritional support and its' efficacy in the Intensive Care Units (ICUs) of Iran. Methods: This cross-sectional study assessed 50 ICU's patients out of 25 hospitals in the 10 major regions of Iran's health system and was performed using the multistage cluster sampling design. The data were collected from patient's medical records, ICU nursing sheets, patients or their relatives from 2017 to 2018. Nutritional status was investigated by modified NUTRIC score and food frequency checklist. Results: This study included 1321 ICU patients with the mean age of 54.8 ± 19.97 years, mean mNUTRIC score of 3.4 ± 2.14, and malnutrition rate of 32.6%. The mean time of first feeding was the second day and most of patients (66%) received nutrition support, mainly through enteral (57.2%) or oral (37%) route during ICU stay. The patients received 59.2 ± 37.78 percent of required calorie and 55.5 ± 30.04 percent of required protein. Adequate intake of energy and protein was provided for 16.2% and 10.7% of the patients, respectively. The result of regression analysis showed that the odds ratio of mNUTRIC score was 0.85 (95% confidence interval [CI] = 0.74–0.98) and APACHE II was 0.92 (95%CI = 0.89–0.95) for the prediction of energy deficiency. Nutrition intake was significantly different from patient's nutritional requirements both in terms of energy (p < 0.001) and protein (p < 0.001). Also, mean mNUTRIC score varied notably (p = 0.011) with changing in energy intake, defined as underfeeding, adequate feeding, and overfeeding. Conclusion: The present findings shown that, provided nutritional care for ICU patients is not adequate for their requirements and nutritional status. … (more)
- Is Part Of:
- Clinical nutrition. Volume 40:Issue 2(2021)
- Journal:
- Clinical nutrition
- Issue:
- Volume 40:Issue 2(2021)
- Issue Display:
- Volume 40, Issue 2 (2021)
- Year:
- 2021
- Volume:
- 40
- Issue:
- 2
- Issue Sort Value:
- 2021-0040-0002-0000
- Page Start:
- 511
- Page End:
- 517
- Publication Date:
- 2021-02
- Subjects:
- Intensive care unit -- Nutritional support -- Energy intake -- Protein deficiency
PNSI Persian Nutritional Survey in Intensive Care Units -- NUTRIC NUTrition Risk in Critically ill
Critically ill -- Nutrition -- Periodicals
Diet therapy -- Periodicals
Parenteral feeding -- Periodicals
Enteral feeding -- Periodicals
Enteral Nutrition -- Periodicals
Parenteral Nutrition -- Periodicals
Metabolism -- Periodicals
Diétothérapie -- Périodiques
Alimentation parentérale -- Périodiques
Alimentation entérale -- Périodiques
Nutrition -- Périodiques
Diet therapy
Enteral feeding
Nutrition
Parenteral feeding
Electronic journals
Periodicals
Electronic journals
615.854 - Journal URLs:
- http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/journal/02615614 ↗
http://www.elsevier.com/journals ↗ - DOI:
- 10.1016/j.clnu.2020.05.047 ↗
- Languages:
- English
- ISSNs:
- 0261-5614
- Deposit Type:
- Legaldeposit
- View Content:
- Available online (eLD content is only available in our Reading Rooms) ↗
- Physical Locations:
- British Library DSC - 3286.314500
British Library DSC - BLDSS-3PM
British Library STI - ELD Digital store - Ingest File:
- 15599.xml