Measuring Simultaneous Emotions: Existing Problems and a New Way Forward. Issue 1 (17th February 2021)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Rhodes-Purdy, Matthew; Navarre, Rachel; Utych, Stephen M.
• Is Part Of: Journal of experimental political science. Volume 8:Issue 1(2021)
• Page Start: 1
• Page End: 14
• Publication Date: 2021-02-17
• Subjects: emotions, -- measurement, -- anger, -- anxiety; Political science -- Periodicals; Political science -- Research -- Periodicals; Political science -- Methodology -- Periodicals; 320.0724
• DOI: 10.1017/XPS.2019.35
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 2052-2630

Abstract

Abstract: Studies on discrete emotions typically work to evoke one emotion at a time. Yet many political phenomena cause multiple emotions. Threats, for example, cause, anger, and fear, have diametrically opposing behavioral consequences. As a result, the effect of experimental treatments can be masked by the countervailing influence of emotions with similar affect. This issue is exacerbated by existing measures of negative emotions, such as the Positive and Negative Affect Schedule (PANAS). We show that the PANAS is contaminated by systematic measurement error, as negative affect produced by one emotion influences responses on the other. To overcome this, we develop an alternative version of the PANAS that allows respondents to select which emotions they are feeling, then rate the severity. This technique accurately captures respondent's emotional reactions, reducing measurement error and thus decreasing the correlation between fear and anger. The tactics we developed have broad relevance for experimental researchers analyzing emotional responses to politics.