DNA recovery from unfired and fired cartridge cases: A comparison of swabbing, tape lifting, vacuum filtration, and direct PCR. (December 2020)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Prasad, Elisha; Hitchcock, Catherine; Raymond, Jennifer; Cole, Andrew; Barash, Mark; Gunn, Peter; McNevin, Dennis; van Oorschot, Roland A.H.
• Is Part Of: Forensic science international. Volume 317(2020)
• Publication Date: 2020-12
• Subjects: Trace -- DNA -- Cartridge case -- Ammunition -- Swab -- Tape lift -- Direct PCR; Medical jurisprudence -- Periodicals; Chemistry, Forensic -- Periodicals; Forensic Medicine -- Periodicals; Médecine légale -- Périodiques; Chimie légale -- Périodiques; Gerechtelijke geneeskunde; Gerechtelijke chemie; Gerechtelijke psychiatrie; Chemistry, Forensic; Medical jurisprudence; Electronic journals; Periodicals; Electronic journals; 614.1
• DOI: 10.1016/j.forsciint.2020.110507
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 0379-0738

Abstract

Highlights: Swabbing, tape lifting, vacuum filtration, and direct PCR were compared. Quantitative data showed no significant difference between swabbing and tapelifting. Tape lifting, with more uploadable profiles, may be a suitable swabbing alternative. Lower DNA recovery from brass cartridges and fired nickel cartridges. Cleaned and uncleaned cartridges showed levels of pre-existing contaminating DNA. Abstract: The ability to recover trace DNA from fired cartridge cases can help establish important leads regarding the handler of the ammunition. Over recent years, several DNA recovery techniques for fired ammunition have been published. Three techniques of significant interest include tape lifting, direct PCR, and vacuum filtration. This study aimed to compare these to the swabbing method currently employed in our jurisdiction. Brass and nickel cartridges of five different calibres were spiked with 20 ng of saliva and subject to DNA collection using all four DNA recovery methods. Unfired and fired cartridges were tested to examine the effects of firing. Swabbing recovered a greater quantity of DNA than vacuum filtration while no significant differences were found between swabbing and tape-lifting. The calibre of ammunition had no effect on DNA recovery. Firing significantly reduced DNA yield from nickel cartridges, while unfired brass cartridges returned less DNA than unfired nickel cartridges. PCR inhibition was not observed in any samples, although degradation indices suggested that most samples were slightly or moderately degraded. Analysis of profiles showed that swabbing and tape lifting resulted in greater numbers of alleles from fired nickel and brass cartridges compared to direct PCR. Samples from nickel cartridges were found to have a greater number of uploadable profiles than samples from brass cartridges. In addition, three mixed profiles were obtained from the single source spiked cartridges as well as evidence of pre-existing DNA on uncleaned cartridges and contaminating alleles on cleaned cartridges. Our results suggest that tape-lifting can be a suitable alternative to swabbing, but that caution must be taken when interpreting profiles from fired cartridge cases as small amounts of DNA not associated with the handling of the cartridges may be present.